Vocabulary Acquisition by reading texts and seeing words in context.
I’m not a fan of flashcards. Reason being in 1990-92 I read J. P. Louw and E. A. Nida early work on lexical semantics. Also Moises Silva Biblical Words and Their Meaning, still worth reading. In 2001-2002 I read Reinier de Blois’ critic of Louw & Nida. Just recently read Dirk Geeraerts’ Theories of Lexical Semantics which compares Cognative and Generative frameworks. Michael Aubrey told me about this work. Flashcards don’t lead to language competence. Memorizing an English gloss or two doesn’t get you anywhere. Find a copy of Moises Silva Biblical Words and Their Meaning which is readable by people who haven’t the background for reading more technical stuff.
Is a diglot better than interlinear?
Reading with a diglot format is one step away from an interlinear. You don’t need to buy anything. The STEP bible has column view, interlinear, and interleaved formats. It also has three different presentations of lexical[1] information all linked to SBLGNT, NASB, ESV and several other bibles. So if you set up a two column display with SBLGNT + NASB you can read without ever opening a new window. The lexical information will display when you hover with the mouse over a word. If you click on the word a whole panel of lexical and grammatical information opens up on the right without obscuring the text.
This layout is so effective I have gradually transitioned to STEP and left Accordance behind.
https://stepweb.atlassian.net/wiki/display/SUG/Quick+overview#Quickoverview-Comparisonstranslationsinanylanguage:
https://www.stepbible.org/?q=version=SBLG
[1] There are scholars working on the STEP word meaning (lexical) resources. They are updating and improving existing standard lexicons which are either in the public domain or have been donated by the copyright holders. These lexical resources will continue to improve over time. They are already very good. I seldom find any reason to consult the big books when I am just reading a passage in the GNT. I have all the lexicons and still consult them while doing exegesis.
Commentaries and the Historical Critical Framework
Once you get beyond devotional commentaries you enter domain of “Biblical Studies” which is an alien universe. You should find out something about the myriad issues about worldviews and hermeneutical approaches. It isn’t safe to just march into “Biblical Studies” without a map.
Books addressing biblical hermeneutics and exegesis are published too often to read all of them. I was amazed that Osborne, Grant R. The Hermeneutical Spiral became a textbook and went through several editions. It was not even a shadow of what it replaced, Bernard Ramn Protestant Biblical Interpretation. I have read several works by Kevin Vanhoozer and Anthony Thiselton. Vanhoozer is focused on “post modernism” and Thiselton reminds me of Carl F. Henry God, Revelation & Authority, (6 Volumes). If you manage to get through the prolegomena you will probably not want to read the rest.
Books critically evaluating Historical Critical Framework are often too technical to be of much use to anyone outside the academy. The history of the secularization of biblical studies is traced in David Laird Duncan The Canon, the Text, the Composition, and the Interpretation of the Gospels, History of the Synoptic Problem … others.
Difficult reading:
Thiselton, Anthony C. Hermeneutics: An Introduction. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.
Vanhoozer, Kevin J. Is There a Meaning in this Text? Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998.
More “accessible” books that I did not find particularly enlightening:
Porter, Stanley E. and Jason C. Robinson. Hermeneutics: An Introduction to Interpretive Theory. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.
Köstenberger, Andreas and Richard D. Patterson, Invitation to Biblical Interpretation. Nashville: B & H, 2011.