Vulgate concordances, two quick questions

This is Dutripon’s concordance to the Vulgate, second edition, 1868 (link below). It looks good to me, not least because I like the Internet Archive format, particularly for reference books. One thing worries me, though. The title page adds: “to the order of Pope Sixtus V,” without mentioning anywhere (as far as I can see) the name of Pope Clement VIII. Could this possibly mean it’s a concordance to the earlier Sixtine Vulgate, rather than the standard Clementine Vulgate? I’d be surprised if publishers were still, in the middle of the nineteenth century, spending money on producing a concordance to a Bible translation that by that time had been out of date for nearly three hundred years. But I’d like to make sure!

https://archive.org/details/LatinVulageConcordanceToTheBible/BibliorumSacrorumConcordantiae/page/n719/mode/2up

And another thing. I’ve been looking for an online concordance to the Nova Vulgata, but I haven’t found a single one. Does such a thing even exist?

Thanks for whatever help you can give!

Sorry, wrong link. This is the title page:

https://archive.org/details/LatinVulageConcordanceToTheBible/BibliorumSacrorumConcordantiae/page/n1/mode/2up

The Johannine Comma appears in the concordance (testimonium, p. 1360, for instance). Also, Exodus 2:25 appears p. 231 (cognovit) but is absent from the section devoted to liberare p. 798.
If this Wikipedia page is to be trusted, it is, I think, safe to say that the concordance is based on the text of the Clementine Vulgate.

Thank you, Shenoute. That is reassuring!

I believe this site has a concordance for the Clementine Vulgate not the Nova but it should be helpful. Vulgate Latin Concordance Letter a