I found this accentuation in Aristotle, Metaphysics Θ.8 1049 b 28:
… ἔκ τινος τι καὶ …
which seems to contradict Smyth 184 sq.
There is also 1033 b 11:
… ἔκ τινος τὶ ἔσται.
Thanks.
I found this accentuation in Aristotle, Metaphysics Θ.8 1049 b 28:
… ἔκ τινος τι καὶ …
which seems to contradict Smyth 184 sq.
There is also 1033 b 11:
… ἔκ τινος τὶ ἔσται.
Thanks.
Problems with your source, dear Sir.
http://heml.mta.ca/lace/sidebysideview2/7780797
ἔκ τινός τι καὶ
http://heml.mta.ca/lace/sidebysideview2/7780747
ἔκ τινός τι ἔσται
Thanks! Strange, though, that the OCTs should have the error twice in the same phrase.