I was reading this article by Charles Bennett and
now I’m wondering if there is any recordings of the correct pronunciation (according to Bennett) in the web.
Also, if possible, can someone tell me where can I find the most detailed
information on the restored classical pronunciation? I am not getting few points on the pronunciation which Bennett mentions in his article…
And I have specialized for two years in mastering the Classical pronunciation of Latin (learning to speak Latin fluently was the driving reason for my acquisition of the language); you may listen to some of my recordings at my website:
additional effects as music and reverb
all of these result in a high level production, which is pretty near to what i
would call optimum. On seems odd for me: you pronounce “ph” as “p”, and
not, as i would expect it, as “f”. Hardly anything remains to wish. Except that
the background music stops in the middle of the reading. It induces too much
ambience to be stopped. Thumbs up! GuttaMaris
Many thanks for the critique! Hopefully I’ll get some time to finish the project soon.
As for ‘ph’, this is the pronunciation in Classical Latin, specifically that the Romans received ph, th, and ch from the Greeks: φ, θ, χ. Now the Romans did not have these letters natively, but in Ancient Greek these respectively were the same as P, T, C in Latin, except that they had extra aspiration — a puff of air, like an ‘h’ sound. For this reason, the Romans used digraphs to represent these sounds, adding the ‘h’:
φ = p + h
θ = t + h
χ = c + h
This is why the Romans transcribed the Greek name, for example, Φίλιππος as ‘Philippus’ — if the initial consonant of that name were the sound of an ‘f,’ then the Romans would have written it so! You’ll notice that I distinguish Latin ‘p’ and ‘ph’ in this way: ‘ph’ is more aspirated sounding that regular ‘p’. The same for the rest of the aspirated consonants.
I agree on the music — I didn’t have any other appropriate songs at my disposal for that one. I’m saving them for future parts.
I concur! The pronunciation is amazingly clear and precise, and the production is very professional. (Btw, you have added some echo to the sound, haven’t you? I understand why, but maybe you should decrease it only a bit.)
Sententia prior autem sole clarius lucet. Nullum inest mendum.
Num conatus multi necesse sunt ut rectionem bonam facias?
Quid dicere voluisti me evadit. Potesne sensum aliis vocibus exponere?
Nonne scripsisti partes septimana novas exhibitus esses?
Nonne scripsisti te scripturum partes alias?
Smile Non te molesta, aeternaliter manebor ob talem ingenium gratissimum.
Claritate eget (ut opinor). Cur passiva forma verbi “manere” usus est? Iam “manere” intransitivum est verbum. Num voluisti dicere: Noli te molestare (noli amice solicitari), ob (tuum) ingenium aeternaliter manebo gratissimus?