None is more . . . than . . . except . . .

In the Posterior Analytics B19, Aristotle has these

• οὐδὲν ἐπιστήμης ἀκριβέστερον ἄλλο γένος ἢ νοῦς
• οὐδὲν ἀληθέστερον ἐνδέχεται εἶναι ἐπιστήμης ἢ νοῦν

which translaters read as

• no kind other than nous ⟨is⟩ more precise than episteme
• nothing at all except nous can be more fully true than episteme.

I get that ἐπιστήμης is a genitive of comparison. But I am not sure of ἢ. Why is nous in the nominative in the first and accusative in the second?

In the first, you can understand εστι, so it’s nominative all the way. (In an “A η B” construction, B has the same case as A.) In the second, ενδεχεται ειναι means “admits of being X,” taking the accusative.

Ah, and ἀληθέστερον is accusative, not nominative.

Thanks!