Is this how εὐνους declines?

I was having a look at two termination adjectives and εὐνους has been sited as an example. I would like to see its whole declension written out in full, but I can’t seem to find it anywhere (if anyone has found it, I would be grateful if you could let me know!). As far as I’m aware it’s the contracted form of εὐνοος (which is used as an adjective itself - I think? - and also two termination).
Here’s my attempt. Could anyone confirm if it’s correct/incorrect? The ones in bold I’m really not sure about:

masc/fem sg
nom = εὐνους (ο + ος)
acc = εὐνουν (ο + ον)
gen = εὐνου (ο + ου)
dat = εὐνῳ (ο + ῳ)

neut sg = same except nom sg = εὐνουν

masc/fem pl
nom = εὐνοι (ο + οι)
acc = εὐνους (ο + ους)
gen = εὐνων (ο + ων)
dat = εὐνοις (ο + οις)

neut pl = same except nom and acc pl = εὐνω (ο + α)

Those all look correct to me, though I’m unsure of εὔνω. Here is the LSJ:

εὔνοος, ον, Att. contr. εὔνους, ουν, dat. εὔνῳ Th.4.87: pl. εὖνοι, also heterocl. εὔνους (contr. from εὔνοες) Lys.8.19, Philem.222, IG22.505.10, al.: gen. pl. εὐνόων Th.6.64 codd., εὔνων edd.

I can’t find any usages of εὔνω for neuter plural in the texts. εὔνους seems to be used instead.

Thanks!