‘se posthac bonos discipulos futuros esse’
Why accusative?
Not with it today.
Paul..
Oh, because it’s indirect.
I get so confused because since this was first drummed into us about 20 chapters ago (llpsi), so much water has passed under the bridge and in this chapter there’s not one mention of the word accusative, only neuter.
OK, as you were…
Paul.
You got it as I was writing this post
Marcus: “Posthāc bonus discipulus futūrus sum…”
Mārcus dīcit “sē posthāc bonum discipulum futūrum esse”