In LLPSI Tullus Mettium puniturus est ei loquit: 'Nunc, quoniam tuum insanabile ingenium est, at tu tuo supplicio doce humanum genus ea sancta credere quae a te violata sunt!
ea sancta = ea (res) sancta? ea sancta acc. neut pl?
In LLPSI Tullus Mettium puniturus est ei loquit: 'Nunc, quoniam tuum insanabile ingenium est, at tu tuo supplicio doce humanum genus ea sancta credere quae a te violata sunt!
ea sancta = ea (res) sancta? ea sancta acc. neut pl?
ea sancta acc. neut pl?
Yes, neuter plural, but res, which would be feminine, is not understood.
Thanks Qimmik
“Tullus Mettium puniturus est ei loquit”
Something amiss here. Delete est or punctuate after it as a heading?
loquitur?
The nice thing in Tullus’ nasty sentence is the at.
Thanks mwh. I’m not really familiar with how the fut participle works.. does it use sum, es, est…or just for emphasis…?
The future periphrastic conjugation combines the future participle with forms of esse (“to be about to” or “to be going to”), but the future participle is simply a verbal adjective (“about to”, “going to”) – like other participles – and doesn’t call for a form of esse in a clause that has a main verb.