I believe I’ve found an error in the 1920 Clyde Pharr’s book on Homeric Greek. The perfect active neuter nominative plural form of λύω is given in section 744 as λελυκόται, while the accusative is given as λελυκότα, which I would have expected. I can’t imagine that the λελυκόται form is correct, and when I googled the word the only thing that comes up is the book. In addition to confirming the error I found, does anybody have a list of any found errors in this book? I believe I found a few more earlier involving extra accent marks, for example.
This was corrected to λελυκότα in the 1959 edition. The 1920 edition does indeed show λελυκόται.
I think we talked about this before, but regarding accents remember there are instances where you may find two accents on a word that is followed by an enclitic.
Yes, we indeed did talk about that before, I recalled seeing it before in line 5. I was recalling the genitive plural active present participle of λύω in section 740, which was written as λυούσᾱ́ων, and I don’t believe there’s any reason why that should be the case.
This too was corrected in the 1959 edition. You’re right: there should be no accent over the ypsilon, just over the long alpha.