whether ... could

Back when Greek was a high-school subject, this sentence was an exam question.

Ohio 1909
https://books.google.com/books?id=yl0bAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA439&lpg=PA439&dq="safely+remain"+ohio&source=bl&ots=E_cRneGcso&sig=ACfU3U34tuSh83mDI8tkaAzjfeuzjfOSbA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiD4Ira-s7pAhWUhHIEHS7jC-UQ6AEwA3oECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q="safely%20remain"%20ohio&f=false

British Columbia 1924

I wonder what the right answer was in those days.

You’re not alone, Joel! Where I found the potential optative was in Goodwin’s notes, where he uses δοίητε ἄν for the direct question. In the notes for the Mather & Hewitt edition, Mather uses δοῖτε ἄν. Doing a little digging, I came up with Smyth 758. S758a directly addresses the 2nd person pl. If I read it right, the shorter form appears in poetry, whereas both forms appear in prose.

I wonder what the right answer was in those days.

I think you would have been fine on the old exam—ancient Gk hasn’t changed that much in 100 years. εἰ δύναιντo/δύνανται/οἷοί τ’ εἶεν/οἷοί τ’ εἰσὶν/κτλ. or potent. opt. + ἄν should all be acceptable constructions. You can also use πότερον/πότερα for the indirect question.

It’s always a good idea to review the morphology of athematic verbs. Composition is the best way.