μὲν . . . δὲ . . . δὲ

I have a passage in Mastronarde’s Unit 25. There were no major problems translating it (besides spending a while figuring out what a couple verbs were), but I did have one question. Here is the passage,

"ὁ Ἀριστοφάνης ἀεὶ ἐπολιτεύετο καὶ τιμῆς ἐφίετο. ὥστε τότε μετὰ Εὐνόμου νηῒ ἀπῆλθεν εἰς τὴν Σικελίαν· ἤλπιζε γὰρ πεῖσαι τὸν Διονύσιον [“Dionysius,”tyrant of Syracuse] κηδεστὴν [“kinsman by marriage”] μὲν γενέσθαι Εὐαγόρᾳ [“Evagoras,” ruler of Cyprus], πολέμιον δὲ Λακεδαιμονίοις, φίλον δὲ καὶ σύμμαχον τῇ πόλει τῇ ὑμετέρᾳ. καὶ πολλοὶ κίνδυνοι [“dangers”] ἦσαν πρὸς τὴν θάλατταν καὶ τοὺς πολεμίους, ἀλλ’ ὅμως [“nevertheless”] ταῦτα ἔπραττε, καὶ τέλος ἔπεισε Διονύσιον μὴ πέμψαι τριήρεις ἃς τότε παρεσκευάσατο Λακεδαιμονίοις.

I placed μὲν in red and δὲ in blue, so they would be easier to see.

Does μὲν affect each δὲ after it?

As explaind in LSJ, μέν can be used with more than one δέ “to connect a series of clauses containing different matter, though with no opposition,”