HONOR is declined from dropping the genitive -IS and so is PATER, but PATER is changed for minor pronounciation reasons.
HONOR PATER
HONORIS PATRIS
HONOREM PATREM
HONORI PATRI
HONORE PATRE
The following words are declined from the Consonant Stem: DUX, REGIS, MILES, PRINCEPS
DUX MILES
DUCIS MILETIS
DUCEM MILITEM
DUCI MILITI
DECE MILITE
HONOR and PATER are declined by dropping the -IS of the genitive while DUX, REGIS are delined from the consontant stem? An example
of DUX being formed is:
DUX placed in Noun Base DUCORUM minus -ORUM gets you DUC. DUC and an -S form DUX. For some reason DUX is different than HONOR. HONOR is straight out declined from the genitive without any explanation about noun bases. DUX needs explanation because declining it changes the spelling. Is this correct?
If this is so what explains the following:
FLUMEN CORPUS
FLUMENIS CORPORIS
FLUMEN CORPOR
FLUMENI CORPORI
FLUMENE CORPORE
These are neuters which do not add ‘s’ but behave like DUX and there is some trick to declining them, needing you to observe the consonant stem. They are aparently behaving diifferntly in declining than HONOR or at least the book is calling attention to them. FLUMEN with the genitive FLUMENIS doesn’t seem to change its spelling but CORPUS with the genitive CORPORIS does. What is the trick to declining these? The book is calling attention to DUX, and REX in one group and FLUMEN and CORPUS in another as behaving differently than HONOR when being declined. DUX makes sense (DUX changed to noun base DECORUM which drops the -ORUM and becomes DUC which adds an ‘s’ which turns into DUX), but the book doesn’t say anything about FLUMEN and CORPUS except that they are in there own class. What is the back story in their derivation?
Thanks.