Forum:
[face=Verdana]
I imagine that students new to Classical Latin (such as myself) begin to appreciate the subtleness of how cases combine within a sentence. An example, and please confirm:
Dea Minerva formam feminae simulat et in terra ambulat.
In this sentence, “formam feminae” seems to mean “form (or shape) of a woman” hence, it being in the genitive case led by an accusative singular.
Question: Are there other cases in the singular and plural that precede the genitive singular and plural? For I would think, it is just nominatives that lead into the genitives.[/face]
Caeruleus
Any case, I’m afraid, can be combined with any other in Latin, according to the demands of the sense. For instance, if you keep the genitive feminae - “of the woman” it can be preceded by forma in any of its case forms singular and plural. To give examples of the singular:
Nom:
forma feminae mirabilis est.
Voc:
quam te, forma feminae, amo!
Acc:
your example
Gen:
visus formae feminae mihi mentem manusque semper excitat.
or with a verb:
memento formae feminae!
Dat:
palmam formae feminae dedi
or with a verb:
nolite, nautae, formae feminae nocere.
Abl:
mille vero astra fulgenta in forma feminae vidi.
or with a verb:
omnesne homines forma feminae vescentur?
needless (and puzzlingly bizarre) examples to come up with, I know, but as I said above - all combinations of cases are possible.
Hope this helps
~dave
Why should it only be nominatives that precede genitives?
So far as I know, there is no (grammatical) limit on the case or number of the noun to which a genitive may, as it were, attach. Consider the position in English:
- Harold’s cat scared me. (cat = subj = nom)
- I scared harold’s cat. (cat = obj = acc)
- I put the food down on the ground for harold’s cat. (cat = ind obj = dat)
- I saw harold’s cat’s basket. (cat = possessive = gen)
- I terrified my children with harold’s cat. (cat = instrument = abl)
The things the genitive does to a noun may need to be done to any noun, in any case, of any number.
(PS: posted more-or-less simultaneously with Whiteoctave’s answer, which makes the same point but properly in Latin)