Adrian, I have a question that I hope will not be found too amiss, because I think your effort is a worthwhile one. (Note: I skimmed the second cited article, but was for some curious reason unable to access the first one – perhaps this line of thought is addressed therein.)
I read many of your posts, but I very rarely make corrections to your Latin, chiefly because my time is limited. Furthermore, as I said, I admire the effort, and making correction after correction comes off as invidious. Nevertheless, as I’ve mentally agreed with you in the past when you’ve criticized others’ efforts at professing to be Latin teachers when they are in fact rank amateurs (as specimen examples of their Latinity prove), I will ask you the same sort of question: since you are a novice, how do you propose to teach others? A game that is intended for beginners, no less than a textbook, must be as error-free as humanly possible.
In recent posts of yours any number of errors, large and small, can be cited: quo in the thread in question has nothing to do with what you’ve provided, faci is not the passive of facere (cf. too your post here); indeed, in your very signature ostendo should be subjunctive (exprimere and non instead of nec would be more idiomatic). This list can be expanded ad libitum, but the point is sufficiently made. It is inevitable that similar errors will creep into the game that you’re designing, which would fundamentally vitiate its very praiseworthy purpose. How do you plan to deal with this issue? (Forgive me if this is discussed in your first paper; as I said, I could not access it.)
I leave aside much else about the Latin itself, but it should perhaps be considered that much of the Latin you write, even when not “wrong,” is of such strange Latinity that no Roman would ever have written it. Since students by and large learn Latin to read what the Romans wrote, there is the strongest argument for basing what we teach on that model. Re-reading, this all seems a bit harsh, but I can assure you that it is not my intention to be overly critical.