πρὸς ταῦτα κακούργει καὶ συκοφάντει, εἴ τι δύνασαι· οὐδέν σου παρίεμαι. ἀλλ’ οὐ μὴ οἷός τ’ ᾖς.
The text-books say that multiple negatives strengthen each other only if the last of them is compound. Here, as is clear from the context, they do strengthen each other, although the last of them is simple; so it seems to be a special case. Does “οὐ μὴ + subj.” generally mean a strong negation?
I’ve found an answer to one of my initial two questions in Burnet’s commentary on Apol. 17 c6, so I left only the other one.
My apologies, I have found an answer to this one too: Smyth 2754. “οὐ μή, and the compounds of each, are used in emphatic negative predictions and prohibitions.”
THIS POSTING MAY BE DELETED.