Hi, Prometheus. Here are my answers to your final exercise (and time permitted, I’ll attempt the rest).
being present παρών (-όντος)
taking λαμβάνων (-οντος) [here in 2nd.aor. λαβών (-όντος)]
having ἔχων (-οντος)
ruling same as reigning?
killing ἀποκτείνων (-οντος) [here in fut. ἀποκτενῶν (-οῦντος)]
reigning βασιλεύων (-οντος)
1 - [10] Δαρείου καὶ Παρυσάτιδος γίγνονται παῖδες δύο, πρεσβύτερος μὲν Ἀρταξέρξης, νεώτερος δὲ Κῦρος·
2 - [9] ἐπεὶ δὲ ἠσθένει Δαρεῖος καὶ ὑπώπτευε τελευτὴν τοῦ βίου, ἐβούλετο τὼ παῖδε ἀμφοτέρω παρεῖναι.
3 - [8] ὁ μὲν οὖν πρεσβύτερος παρὼν ἐτύγχανε·
4 - [7] Κῦρον δὲ μεταπέμπεται ἀπὸ τῆς ἀρχῆς ἧς αὐτὸν σατράπην ἐποίησε, καὶ στρατηγὸν δὲ αὐτὸν ἀπέδειξε πάντων ὅσοι ἐς Καστωλοῦ πεδίον ἁθροίζονται.
5 - [6] ἀναβαίνει οὖν ὁ Κῦρος λαβὼν Τισσαφέρνην ὡς φίλον, καὶ τῶν Ἑλλήνων ἔχων ὁπλίτας ἀνέβη τριακοσίους, ἄρχοντα δὲ αὐτῶν Ξενίαν Παρράσιον.
6 - [5] ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος καὶ κατέστη εἰς τὴν βασιλείαν Ἀρταξέρξης, Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει τὸν Κῦρον πρὸς τὸν ἀδελφὸν ὡς ἐπιβουλεύοι αὐτῷ.
7 - [4] ὁ δὲ πείθεται καὶ συλλαμβάνει Κῦρον ὡς ἀποκτενῶν·
8 - [3] ἡ δὲ μήτηρ ἐξαιτησαμένη αὐτὸν ἀποπέμπει πάλιν ἐπὶ τὴν ἀρχήν.
9 - [2] ὁ δ᾽ ὡς ἀπῆλθε κινδυνεύσας καὶ ἀτιμασθείς, βουλεύεται ὅπως μήποτε ἔτι ἔσται ἐπὶ τῷ ἀδελφῷ, ἀλλά, ἢν δύνηται, βασιλεύσει ἀντ᾽ ἐκείνου.
10 - [1] Παρύσατις μὲν δὴ ἡ μήτηρ ὑπῆρχε τῷ Κύρῳ, φιλοῦσα αὐτὸν μᾶλλον ἢ τὸν βασιλεύοντα Ἀρταξέρξην.
a more scrambled order would have been welcomed 
(1) Κῦρος, ὁ τοῦ Δαρείου υἱός, Πέρσης ἦν καλὸς καὶ ἀγαθός. σατράπην δὲ αὐτὸν ἐποίησεν ὁ Δαρεῖος τῆς Λυδίας καὶ τῆς Φρυγίας καὶ τῆς Καππαδοκίας. (2) χωρία δὲ ἰσχυρὰ εἶχεν ἐν τῇ ἀρχῇ ὁ Κῦρος καὶ πλοῖα μακρὰ ἐν τῇ θαλάττῃ, καὶ στρατιῶται δὲ αὐτῷ ἐν τῇ χώρᾳ ἦσαν ἀγαθοί, ὁπλῖται Ἑλληνικοὶ καὶ πελτασταὶ καὶ τοξόται Περσικοί. (3) Τισσαφέρνης δέ, ὁ τῆς Καρίας σατράπης, τῷ Κύρῳ πολέμιος ἦν, τότε δὲ οὔτε ἐστράτευεν ἐπ᾿ αὐτὸν οὔτε διήρπαζε τὴν χώραν. (4) Κῦρος γὰρ στρατηγὸς ἐν πολέμῳ δεινὸς ἦν, υἱὸς δὲ τοῦ Δαρείου· ὥστε φόβον εἶχεν ὁ Τισσαφέρνης πρὸς Κῦρον.
from Frost’s Alpha primer, talking about Cyrus:
Κῦρος, ὁ Δαρείου, ἀδελφὸς ἦν Αρταξέρξου τῆς Μηδίας βασιλέως· καἳ ὁ πατὴρ ἐποίησεν αὐτὸν στρατηγὸν τῶν τῆς Φρυγίας στρατιωτῶν. ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησεν ὁ πατήρ, ὁ Κῦρος σὺν μυρίοις 'Ελλησι καὶ δυνάμει βαρβάρων ἐστρατεύσατο ἐπὶ τὸν βασιλέα, εἰς τὴν Βαβυλωνίαν.
Cyrus, Son of Darius, was Artaxerxes’ brother, the king of Media; and his father made him general of Phrygia’s soldiers.
When his father had died (Smyth §1943), Cyrus, in company with countless Greeks and quantity of barbarians, waged war against the king, into the territory of Babylonia (LSJ εἰς A.I.).
[edit: corrected my mistake by changing kingdom (ἡ βασιλεἰᾱ, it’d have been here in acc. τὴν βασιλείᾱν) to king (from ὁ βασιλεύς)]
Thanks, Nate! (You like your Greek "well-"scrambled? I’ll keep that in mind for future breakfasts! 
)
By “ruling” and “reigning” I had in mind the two words, ἄρχοντα and βασιλοντα, in the first four lines of the Anabasis. And thanks for pointing out the errors that that one of my “present participles” was actually a future participle, and one an aorist (there seem to be a couple of other aorist participles in there, too).
In the Frost excerpt, I would have translated δυνάμει βαρβάρων as “barbarian/foreign forces”.
(By the way, didn’t you say that you had some brief compositions based on White’s First Greek Book?)
Lee
Thanks for the clarification of the difference between ἄρχων and βασιλεύων.
and it is actually the first time I encountered δυνάμει, searched LSJ for the definitions and decided on one,
but yours makes more sense here (though it is in singular, force of foreigners)
About the compositions I should have been more clearer as it was related to Athanze book.
I have two short ones on Jay’s forum, and I hope to write some more on both Athenaze and FGB soon.
5 - [6] ἀναβαίνει οὖν ὁ Κῦρος λαβὼν Τισσαφέρνην ὡς φίλον, καὶ τῶν Ἑλλήνων ἔχων ὁπλίτας ἀνέβη τριακοσίους, ἄρχοντα δὲ αὐτῶν Ξενίαν Παρράσιον.
I think I should have translated ἄρχοντα as “leading” or “commanding” here, rather than “ruling”.
I think that in this case, it is not a participle but a masculine noun in acc.s. from ἄρχων (-οντος), ruler, commander.
it’s in the accusative because it’s still the object of ἔχων:
…he also embarked having 300 Greek hoplites, and (having) Xenias of Parrhasia as their commander.
Just to pause for a moment, I’d like to remind readers that there’s a sort of division of labor working out, with my new-fangled reading-based exercises based on White’s reading exercises and Xenophon’s Anabasis on this thread in TextKit, and the actual Greek-English and English-Greek translation exercises from White’s First Greek Book on Jason’s site, http://www.jhronline.com/forum/index.php. (I’ll try to contribute to the translation exercises also, when I can.) Grammatical discussion and, perhaps, Socratic dialogue exploring the true meaning of the words can be found on either forum.
I’d like to know, besides those of us who have been posting (who clearly have been learning Greek for a while), whether there are also readers for whom White’s book really is their “first Greek book”. Please let us know how you’re finding the readings and the exercises and what you would find helpful to focus on.
(Needless to say, others are welcome to speak up and also to contribute their own exercises.)
In the meantime, here’s the next reading selection from White, this time from Lesson 14 (Section 134):
134. Artaxerxes becomes King and arrests Cyrus
Κῦρος οὖν σατράπης ἦν τῆς Λυδίας καὶ τῆς Φρυγίας καὶ τῆς Καππαδοκίας. ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος, Ἁρταξέρξης ὁ τοῦ Κύρου ἀδελφὸς ἐβασίλευσε τῶν Περσῶν, καὶ Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει τὸν Κῦρον πρὸς τὸν ἁδελφὸν ὡς ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ. ὁ δ’ Ἁρταξέρξης συλλαμβάνει Κῦρον.
(Anyone know a convenient way to create a vocabulary list?)
As a preliminary exercise, how about removing the conjunctions and particles and breaking it up into short, simple sentences, that are easier to make sense of at a glance? For instance, the first sentence could become
In the next exercise, you’ll be asked to review typical masculine nouns ending in -O and plug in the right form of ἀδελφός (brother).
By way of a quick review, look at this excerpt from the story of Cain and Abel in the Septuagint (Gen. 2:8-9):
καὶ ἐγένετο ἐν τῷ εἶναι αὐτοὺς ἐν τῷ πεδίῳ καὶ ἀνέστη Καιν ἐπὶ Αβελ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ καὶ ἀπέκτεινεν αὐτόν.
καὶ εἶπεν ὁ θεὸς πρὸς Καιν
Ποῦ ἐστιν Αβελ ὁ ἀδελφός σου;
ὁ δὲ εἶπεν
Οὐ γινώσκω· μὴ φύλαξ τοῦ ἀδελφοῦ μού εἰμι ἐγώ;
The pattern in the singular is
ὁ ἀδελφός (nominative–subject)
τὸν ἀδελφόν (accusative–object)
τοῦ ἀδελφοῦ (genitive–possessive)
τῷ ἀδελφῳ (dative–indirect object–not shown in this excerpt)
Exercise on Second Declension (-O Stem Nouns)
a. Insert the correct case form of ἀδελφός (brother):
Κῦρος οὖν σατράπης ἦν τῆς Λυδίας καὶ τῆς Φρυγίας καὶ τῆς Καππαδοκίας. ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος, Ἁρταξέρξης ὁ τοῦ Κύρου _____________ ἐβασίλευσε τῶν Περσῶν, καὶ Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει τὸν Κῦρον πρὸς τὸν _______________ ὡς ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ. ὁ δ’ Ἁρταξέρξης συλλαμβάνει Κῦρον.
b. Insert the correct case form of the definite article (masculine):
Κῦρος οὖν σατράπης ἦν τῆς Λυδίας καὶ τῆς Φρυγίας καὶ τῆς Καππαδοκίας. ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος, Ἁρταξέρξης ὁ ______ Κύρου ἀδελφὸς ἐβασίλευσε _______ Περσῶν, καὶ Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει _________ Κῦρον πρὸς ______ ἁδελφὸν ὡς ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ. ὁ δ’ Ἁρταξέρξης συλλαμβάνει Κῦρον.
Break the compound verbs (in boldface) into their root verb and prefix (e.g. ἐπιβουλεύει = ἐπι + βουλεύει).
Τισσαφέρνης δέ, ὁ τῆς Καρίας σατράπης, τῷ Κύρῳ πολέμιος ἦν, τότε δὲ οὔτε ἐστράτευεν ἐπ᾿ αὐτὸν οὔτε διήρπαζε_________________τὴν χώραν. Κῦρος γὰρ στρατηγὸς ἐν πολέμῳ δεινὸς ἦν, υἱὸς δὲ τοῦ Δαρείου· ὥστε φόβον εἶχεν ὁ Τισσαφέρνης πρὸς Κῦρον.
ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος, Ἁρταξέρξης ὁ τοῦ Κύρου ἀδελφὸς ἐβασίλευσε τῶν Περσῶν, καὶ Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει___________________________ τὸν Κῦρον πρὸς τὸν ἁδελφὸν ὡς ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ. ὁ δ’ Ἁρταξέρξης συλλαμβάνει_______ Κῦρον.
Match the verbs (in boldface) in the reading passages from Lessons 13 and 14 with their translations:
125. The Parentage, Race, and Power of Cyrus the Younger
Κῦρος, ὁ τοῦ Δαρείου υἱός, Πέρσης ἦν καλὸς καὶ ἀγαθός. σατράπην δὲ αὐτὸν ἐποίησεν ὁ Δαρεῖος τῆς Λυδίας καὶ τῆς Φρυγίας καὶ τῆς Καππαδοκίας. χωρία δὲ ἰσχυρὰ εἶχεν ἐν τῇ ἀρχῇ ὁ Κῦρος καὶ πλοῖα μακρὰ ἐν τῇ θαλάττῃ, καὶ στρατιῶται δὲ αὐτῷ ἐν τῇ χώρᾳ ἦσαν ἀγαθοί, ὁπλῖται Ἑλληνικοὶ καὶ πελτασταὶ καὶ τοξόται Περσικοί.
Τισσαφέρνης δέ, ὁ τῆς Καρίας σατράπης, τῷ Κύρῳ πολέμιος ἦν, τότε δὲ οὔτε ἐστράτευεν ἐπ᾿ αὐτὸν οὔτε διήρπαζε τὴν χώραν. Κῦρος γὰρ στρατηγὸς ἐν πολέμῳ δεινὸς ἦν, υἱὸς δὲ τοῦ Δαρείου· ὥστε φόβον εἶχεν ὁ Τισσαφέρνης πρὸς Κῦρον.
134. Artaxerxes becomes King and arrests Cyrus
Κῦρος οὖν σατράπης ἦν τῆς Λυδίας καὶ τῆς Φρυγίας καὶ τῆς Καππαδοκίας. ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος, Ἁρταξέρξης ὁ τοῦ Κύρου ἀδελφὸς ἐβασίλευσε τῶν Περσῶν, καὶ Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει τὸν Κῦρον πρὸς τὸν ἁδελφὸν ὡς ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ. ὁ δ’ Ἁρταξέρξης συλλαμβάνει Κῦρον.
1. ἦν_____________________
2. ἐ-ποίησεν _______________________
3. εἶχεν____________________________
4. ἦσαν ___________________________
5. ἐ-στράτευεν______________________
6. δια-ήρπαζε_______________________
7. ἐ-τελεύτησε______________________
8. ἐ-βασίλευσε______________________
9. δια-βάλλει _______________________
10. ἐπι-βουλεύει______________________
11. συν-λαμβάνει_____________________
a. slandered (“cast against”)
b. plots (“wishes against”)
c. became king (“reigned”)
d. captures, arrests (“takes along”)
e. pillaged (“robbed throughout”)
f. had
g. was
h. died (“finished”)
i. made war, campaigned
j. were
k. made
Exercise: Break into Many Short, Simple Sentences (Solution)
Let me provide solutions to my own exercise from Oct. 16 about how a passage like the one from White’s Lesson 14 can be broken down into simpler sentences, eliminating conjunctions like KAI and OYN and particles like MEN and δὲ to make reading and understanding the basic statements that much simpler. I’ll also translate these simplified sentences, in order to enhance your comprehension when you read the passage the next time.
Exercise: Break into Many Short, Simple Sentences (Solution)
134. Artaxerxes becomes King and arrests Cyrus
[1.] Κῦρος οὖν σατράπης ἦν τῆς Λυδίας καὶ τῆς Φρυγίας καὶ τῆς Καππαδοκίας. [2.]ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος, Ἁρταξέρξης ὁ τοῦ Κύρου ἀδελφὸς ἐβασίλευσε τῶν Περσῶν, [3.]καὶ Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει τὸν Κῦρον πρὸς τὸν ἁδελφὸν ὡς ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ. [4.] ὁ δ’ Ἁρταξέρξης συλλαμβάνει Κῦρον.
(1) Κῦρος σατράπης ἦν τῆς Λυδίας. ‘Cyrus was the Satrap of Lydia’
(+ Κῦρος σατράπης ἦν τῆς Φρυγίας. '‘Cyrus was the Satrap of Phrygia’;
Κῦρος σατράπης ἦν τῆς Καππαδοκίας. '‘Cyrus was the Satrap of Cappadocia’)
(2) ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος. ‘Darius died’
(3) Ἁρταξέρξης ἐβασίλευσε τῶν Περσῶν. ‘Artaxerxes became king of the Persians’
(Ἁρταξέρξης ἦν ὁ τοῦ Κύρου ἀδελφὸς ‘Artaxerxes was Cyrus’s brother’)
Complex sentence [2]-> ἐπεὶ (2), (3)
[2.]ἐπεὶ δὲ (2) ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος, (3) Ἁρταξέρξης (ὁ τοῦ Κύρου ἀδελφὸς) ἐβασίλευσε τῶν Περσῶν
(4) Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει τὸν Κῦρον ‘Tissaphernes accuses Cyrus’
(5) (Κῦρος) ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ (τὸν ἁδελφὸν) ‘Cyrus plots against him (his brother)’
Complex sentence [3]->(4) ὡς (5)
[3.] (4) Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει τὸν Κῦρον πρὸς τὸν ἁδελφὸν ὡς (5) ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ.
(6) ὁ Ἁρταξέρξης συλλαμβάνει Κῦρον ‘Artaxerxes arrests Cyrus.’
Thank you, Prometheus for your helpful exercises. very much appreciated!
your detailed last post on how to separate complex sentences to its constituent parts
does make life easier.
in this sentence though:
(4) Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει τὸν Κῦρον ‘Tissaphernes accuses Cyrus’
(5) (Κῦρος) ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ (τὸν ἁδελφὸν) ‘Cyrus plots against him (his brother)’
αὐτῷ stands for τῷ ἀδελφῷ because that’s the case this verb requires.
a. Insert the correct case form of ἀδελφός (brother):
Κῦρος οὖν σατράπης ἦν τῆς Λυδίας καὶ τῆς Φρυγίας καὶ τῆς Καππαδοκίας. ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος, Ἁρταξέρξης ὁ τοῦ Κύρου ἀδεφὸς ἐβασίλευσε τῶν Περσῶν, καὶ Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει τὸν Κῦρον πρὸς τὸν ἀδελφὸν ὡς ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ. ὁ δ’ Ἁρταξέρξης συλλαμβάνει Κῦρον.
b. Insert the correct case form of the definite article (masculine):
Κῦρος οὖν σατράπης ἦν τῆς Λυδίας καὶ τῆς Φρυγίας καὶ τῆς Καππαδοκίας. ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος, Ἁρταξέρξης ὁ τοῦ Κύρου ἀδελφὸς ἐβασίλευσε τῶν Περσῶν, καὶ Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει τὸν Κῦρον πρὸς τὸν ἁδελφὸν ὡς ἐπιβουλεύει αὐτῷ. ὁ δ’ Ἁρταξέρξης συλλαμβάνει Κῦρον.
Τισσαφέρνης δέ, ὁ τῆς Καρίας σατράπης, τῷ Κύρῳ πολέμιος ἦν, τότε δὲ οὔτε ἐστράτευεν ἐπ᾿ αὐτὸν οὔτε διήρπαζε (διὰ+ἥρπαζε) τὴν χώραν. Κῦρος γὰρ στρατηγὸς ἐν πολέμῳ δεινὸς ἦν, υἱὸς δὲ τοῦ Δαρείου· ὥστε φόβον εἶχεν ὁ Τισσαφέρνης πρὸς Κῦρον.
ἐπεὶ δὲ ἐτελεύτησε Δαρεῖος, Ἁρταξέρξης ὁ τοῦ Κύρου ἀδελφὸς ἐβασίλευσε τῶν Περσῶν, καὶ Τισσαφέρνης διαβάλλει (διὰ+βάλλει) τὸν Κῦρον πρὸς τὸν ἁδελφὸν ὡς ἐπιβουλεύει (ἐπὶ+βουλεύει) αὐτῷ. ὁ δ’ Ἁρταξέρξης συλλαμβάνει (σὺν+λαμβάνει) Κῦρον.
1. ἦν was
2. ἐ-ποίησεν made
3. εἶχεν had
4. ἦσαν were
5. ἐ-στράτευεν made war, campaigned
6. δια-ήρπαζε pillaged (“robbed throughout”)
7. ἐ-τελεύτησε died (“finished”)
8. ἐ-βασίλευσε became king (“reigned”)
9. δια-βάλλει slandered (“cast against”)
10. ἐπι-βουλεύει plots (“wishes against”)
11. συν-λαμβάνει captures, arrests (“takes along”)
You’re right! Thanks for the correction.
Hi, Prometheus.
I sat down the past couple of days to attempt writing a short story with vocabulary from FGB,
but ended up using constructions not yet learned (I’ve learned most of them before; others with
the help of Smyth) and new vocabulary and special meanings from LSJ. Hope you and others will like
this and suggest corrections.
EDIT: corrected one small part.
ὅ τε πελταστὴς καὶ ὁ τοξότης διαλεγόμενοι ἐν τῷ χωρίῳ ἐκάθιζον.
οὗτος ἐκείνῳ ἔλεγεν· “ἰδού· τόξον μου καλὸν καὶ ἀγαθόν ἐστιν·
ἠγόρασα τοῦτο τὸ τόξον τῇ προτέρῃ (ἡμέρᾳ).” ὁ δὲ εἶπεν· “τόξον
σου οὐδενὸς ἀξιῶ. ἰδοὺ γὰρ πέλτη μου καλλίων καὶ ἀμείνων ἢ
τόξου σου.”
πολὺν χρόνον οὕτω διελέγοντο μέχρι καμὼν εἰσέβη ὁ στρατηγὸς
εἰς τὸ χωρίον. ἀλλήλοις οὖν “σίγα,” ἔφασαν· δεινὸς γὰρ ἦν καὶ
ἐφοβοῦντο μὴ αὐτοῖς ὀργίζηται (or ὀργίζοιτο). δι᾿ ὀλίγου
ἐβουλεύοντο τίς αὐτῶν τῷ στρατηγῷ προσχωρήσει καὶ μειλίξει
αὐτόν (or ὅστις…προσχωρήσοι…μειλίξοι). τέλος δ᾿ ὁ τοξότης
τολμήσας ἑκὼν αὐτῷ προσεχώρει καὶ “χαῖρε, ὦ στρατηγέ,” ἔφη· “τί
πάσχεις;”
ἐνταῦθα δὴ ὁ στρατηγὸς ἰσχυρὸς εἶναι πᾶσι δοκῶν ἔκλαυσεν [aor.
of κλαίω/κλάω (incotr.) = began weeping]. καὶ πολὺν (χρόνον)
οὐδεὶς ἐδύνατο μειλίττειν αὐτὸν ἀλλ᾿ ὅμως ἐπειρᾶτ᾿ ὁ τοξότης ὡς
ἐδύνατο. μειλιξάμενος περὶ τῶν πεπονθότων ἔλεγεν· “εἰς τὸν οἶκον
ἐτύγχανον εἰσβαίνων ὅτε τὴν θυγατέρα μου ἀκίνητον οὖσαν εἶδον.
ἡ γυνὴ οὐκ ᾕδη αὐτὴν τὰ πεπονθότα. εἰ αὐτὸς παρῆ, ἀπεκώλυον ἂν
τὸν πονηρὸν αὐτὴν μὴ ἀποκτείνειν.” καὶ οὐκ ἔφη ἔχειν τί πράττῃ
(or πράττοι).
κλαίων δ᾿ “ὡς καλὴ ἦν,” ἔφη· “μόνον δώδεκ᾿ ἔτη γεγονυῖα.”
ἐξώρκου οὖν τόν τε τοξότην καὶ πάντας τοὺς παρόντας ἐν τῷ χωρίῳ ἦ
μὴν διώξειν τοῦτον τὸν πονηρόν. ἔλεγεν ὅτι εἰ συλλαμβάνοι
αὐτόν, ἀποκτενοίη [i.e. “ἐὰν συλλαμβάνω αὐτόν, ἀποκτενῶ”
(pres.subj. » fut.ind.)]. τέλος δ᾿ ἐξέβη ὁ στρατηγὸς ἐκ τοῦ χωρίου
πρὸς τὸν οἶκον τῆς θυγατρὸς λελειμμένος.
Thanks for posting your story, Nate. I’m enjoying it, but it’s taking me a while to get through it. I’m moving a paragraph at a time. In the first paragraph (actually, the first sentence), I have questions about the participles διαλεγόμενοι and κάθιζον: Is διαλεγόμενοι a present, middle participle in nominative plural “they are conversing” (presumably middle because of a reciprocal meaning)? Would I get the same meaning if I substituted the present inflected form, like διαλεγόucιv? Shouldn’t (ἐν τῷ χωρίῳ) κάθιζον be κάθιζονTEZ because it’s plural?