# Inchoative verbs

**URL:** <https://www.textkit.com/t/inchoative-verbs/13473>\
**Category:** Learning Latin\
**Created:** [May 19, 2015, 2:49pm UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/inchoative-verbs/13473 "2015-05-19T14:49:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![swtwentyman](https://www.textkit.com/user_avatar/www.textkit.com/swtwentyman/32/110_2.png) [@swtwentyman](https://www.textkit.com/u/swtwentyman)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2015, 2:49pm UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/inchoative-verbs/13473/1 "2015-05-19T14:49:23Z")

</div>

Regarding verbs with “-sc-”: I’ve seen in several places that the meaning is intended that the action is just being set out upon when such a verb is used, but the only ones I know offhand that I can see as being such are “profiscisci” and “(cog)noscere”, in that getting to know something is the beginning of knowing it. Off the top of my head: adipisci, delitiscere, adsciscere, ulcisci… that’s not very many but they don’t seem to be inchoative. The “-sc-” is dropped in the perfect/supine forms: is this because the fact of having completed something begun is regarded as more important than just beginning it? Basically, is there a connotation to inchoative verbs that I ought to be keeping in mind?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Interaxus](https://www.textkit.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/d26b3c/32.png) [@Interaxus](https://www.textkit.com/u/Interaxus)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2015, 4:53pm UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/inchoative-verbs/13473/2 "2015-05-19T16:53:01Z")

</div>

Here are a few more from Wikipedia:

The Latin language uses the infix -sc- to show inchoative force. The infix is normally seen in the present tense stem, and is not present in the third and fourth principal parts.

apiscor, apiscī, aptus sum reach  
crescō, crescere, crēvī, crētus come into being, grow up  
convalescō, convalescere, convaluī recover, grow strong  
discō, discere, didicī learn  
īrascor, īrascī, īrātus sum be in a rage  
lapidescō, lapidescere become stone  
nanciscor, nanciscī, nactus/nanctus sum get  
nascor, nasci, natus sum to be begotten, to be generated, to be born, as nascent life  
noscō, noscere, nōvī, nōtus get to know  
obdormiscō, obdormiscere, obdormīvī, obdormītus sum fall asleep  
poscō, poscere, poposcī demand  
proficiscor, proficiscī, profectus sum set out  
rubescō, rubescere, rubuī to grow red, redden

Not to mention Wiktionary, which lists 232 of them.

Hope someone qualified to answer your question responds. (I’m sure they will!)

Vale!  
Int

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mwh](https://www.textkit.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/6f9a4e/32.png) [@mwh](https://www.textkit.com/u/mwh)\
**Post date:** [May 21, 2015, 2:48am UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/inchoative-verbs/13473/3 "2015-05-21T02:48:47Z")

</div>

Right, some of the verbs so formed don’t seem to carry any “inchoative” sense at all. But many clearly do, and even in verbs where the force of the infix is not immediately obvious, I’m not sure it ever quite disappears. It’s interesting morphologically, from the point of view of historical linguistics. The formation is shared by Greek. There you have not only inchoative presents as in Latin (γίγνωσκω ~ _gnosco_ for example) but also past-tense formations in –σκ- with “iterative” force, coexisting with regular non-iterative forms, e.g. (ἐ)φευγε he was fleeing vs. φεύγεσκε he was repeatedly fleeing (Homeric: it’s archaic). In Latin you can discern its force readily enough in most of the verbs listed in Interaxus’ post. _irasci_, for instance, to get angry, to (start to) get into a rage (rather than “to _be_ in a rage” as translated), etc. etc. So it’s more than a semantically void relic (though in principle it could be), and should serve to give you some insight into these verbs’ meaning, at least into their original or “proper” meaning. “Inchoative” is an ugly term and perhaps not an entirely accurate one, since these forms tend to cover more than just the beginning of a process. It might help to recognize that. Anyway, you’re quite right to recognize that the infix has no place in the perfect, since by then the process is complete. (_iratus sum_ vs. _irascor_ e.g. — or _delitui_ vs. _delitisco_.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![swtwentyman](https://www.textkit.com/user_avatar/www.textkit.com/swtwentyman/32/110_2.png) [@swtwentyman](https://www.textkit.com/u/swtwentyman)\
**Post date:** [May 21, 2015, 5:46pm UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/inchoative-verbs/13473/4 "2015-05-21T17:46:23Z")

</div>

Very interesting. Thanks.
