And Markos corrected αἰτίαν to αἰτία for me, even if he didn’t highlight it. I’ll fix up both paragraphs and record mp3s of me reading them on archive.org.
I think that I understand all of your corrections, and don’t need to ask for further explanation. (I expect to need to ask as these get harder). The biggest pattern of errors that I see is singular/plural with ἐστί. I’ll double-check that in the future.
@bedwere – I’m trying to follow #938, and #939 from Chandler’s Greek Accentuation. He says that ἔστι is paroxytone whenever it affirms existence or possibility. In the examples cited where I have ἔστι or ἔστιν I was trying to follow this rule. Is there something that I’m missing?
If you look at the examples in Smyth, you’ll find:
b. ἐστί is written ἔστι at the beginning of a sentence; when it expresses existence or possibility; when it follows οὐκ, μή, εἰ, ὡς, καί, ἀλλά (or ἀλλ᾽), τοῦτο (or τοῦτ᾽); and in ἔστιν οἵ some, ἔστιν ὅτε sometimes. Thus, εἰ ἔστιν οὕτως if it is so, τοῦτο ὃ ἔστι that which exists.
The key to Sidgwick agrees with my understanding. But I leave further analysis to those who are more competent than me.
Looking over Chandler and the LSJ, it seems that another way to state the rule is to use ἔστι in “cases where it could not be omitted.”
The LSJ states that “later Gramm. wrote ἔστι as Subst. Verb.” The examples of the Substantive Verb use are Α. Ι-VI in the article for εἰμί. This seems to be the majority of the non-Copula usage.
ὁ ἵππος ὁ ἐμός means “my horse,” emphatic “my.” “My horse” is just ο ιππος μου.
λέξω. ἐρῶ more usual.
οἵς οἷς
τὸν τοῦ ἵπποῦ σῖτον ἔκλεπτον better with γὰρ after τὸν. Greek uses connectives except where asyndeton is called for—as it is in the previous sentence—and in the 2nd.
ἀλλ’ ἡ μηχανὴ καλή ἐστιν ἥν ἔχω reads very oddly: “But the plan is fine, the one that I have.” You mean something like “But I have a fine plan”? αλλα μηχανην εχω καλήν τινα (note idiomatic τινα). Or if “My plan (the plan I have) is a fine one,” η δε μηχανη ἣν εχω καλή ’στιν. (There are syntactically challenging ways of doing this too.)
λίθους γὰρ ἔθηκα ἐς τὴν φάτνην Good word order.
ἐσθίων ὁ ἵππος τὸν σῖτον Better to keep εσθιων τον σιτον (or τον σιτον εσθιων) together. Connective needed, another γαρ best.
ἀποπτύει, κλέπτουσι, εστι. Futures would read more naturally, but I guess you’re translating presents.
Connective for next sentence. ωστε best.
ουκετι better before κακοι.
εκεινοις better αυτοις, since no others are in question. Word order good.
Ex. II, Three Men in a Boat, as revised
The only things outright wrong here are ἀποτρέπω τοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς (shd be τους οφθαλμους) and ἐν τῶν ὀφθαλμῶν (εν takes dative).
But if you want to smarten it up a bit and make it read more naturally you might consider:
ὁ νέος ναύτης φέρει ἱστiον τι
ὁ δὲ τρίτος ἐστὶ παρὰ τῷ πηδαλίῳ (looks odd without εστι)
οὗτος δ’ οὐx ὁρᾷ
τὸν δεινὸν κίνδυνον wd be nicer with δεινον predicative, τον κ. δ. With your word order it kind of implies there are other κίνδυνοι, and this is the δεινός one.
αὕτη ἡ πέτρα better linked with δε or και
“τοῖς δὲ πολλοῖς αἰτία ἔσται θανάτου.” The trouble with your first version as preliminarily corrected by Markos (ἡ τοῦ θανάτου αἰτία ἔσται τοῖς πολλοῖς) was not the word order or lack of euphony but the grammar and meaning. The article makes it the subject, not the predicate as (presumably) it needs to be. This is not a “subjective” call.
But I’m not sure that “for most people it will be the cause of death” is really what you want to say. If it is, it’s now fine.
“αὐτοὶ νῦν ἐγγὺς τοῦ τόπου καὶ ὑπὸ φόβου ὠχρός εἰμι.”
It’s not clear what αυτοι ““(they) themselves” is doing. Do you mean εκεῖνοι, They?
Since you change the subject it would be better to have εισί in this clause (matching ειμι in the next). And ἐγώ in the next, to give a “they … I …” contrast.
“ἐν τῶν ὀφθαλμῶν” see above. If it refers to the narrator, you should slip in a μοι (not μου).
I haven’t looked at the original (nor the key!), so some of this may be off target.
III. μηχανὴ⟨ν⟩ typo. γεω⟨ρ⟩γοι.
I’ll bow out at this point (unless there are questions on this, in which case I’ll try to address them), so that everyone can have a go.
EDIT. Sorry,crossposted with your latest with the next exercises. You move too fast for me!
EXERCISE I
Here are two questions about Exercise I:
νῦν ἐστί, Sidgwick puts an accent on the ultima of ἐστι, I assume, because of the break in thought. Otherwise, I would have expected no accent. DA Carson rule EPR.4 “If the word preceding an enclitic has a circumflex accent on the ultima, then both monosyllabic and disyllabic enclitics normally lose their accent.”
I don’t understand Sidgwick’s “ἴσως τούτου τοῦ κύκνου ὀστοῦν λίθῳ διερράγη.”
διερράγη must by self-affected (medio-passive). So, wouldn’t “bone” be in the Nominative? “The bone was broken…” I translated it: ἴσως διερράγη λίθῳ ὀστέον τοῦ τούτου τοῦ κύκνου. JEIDSATH translated similarily,
ἴσως ὀστέον τούτου τοῦ κύκνου διερράγη λίθῳ.
Exercise I – Σαῦλου composition before looking at key or other Learner’s attempts:
Question:
Jeisdath wrote, ἰδοὺ ἔξω τοῦ κινδύνου εἰσὶ καὶ. I don’t understand the rules about a moveable Nun, but it feels like it should have one. I found “εισιν και” 61x in the NT.
Comments on Jeisdath’s revised composition:
αὐτοὶ νῦν ἐγγὺς τοῦ τόπου καὶ ὑπὸ φόβου ὠχρός εἰμι.
Cf. MWH comment. Aὐτοί here would give the sense of “they themselves.” MWH suggests ἐκεῖνοι. Οὗτοι would also work. Either one carries less of a deictic sense in the Nominative because they are so often needed to serve in the place of the Nominative forms of αὐτός, which is reserved for this self/same sense.
Comments on Sidgwick’s composition:
Sidgwick, “αὕτη δὲ χαλεπή ἐστὶ, καὶ πολλοῖς ἔσται αἰτία τοῦ θανάτου.”
Sidgwick used the wrong word here for “hard.” χαλεπός is hard/difficult/harsh, not physically hard. He evidently intended to use στερρὸς since it is given in the vocabulary for this exercise.
Mark’s translation of the last half of the sentence sounds better to me than Sidgwick’s:
τοῖς δὲ πολλοῖς αἰτία ἔσται θανάτου.
Exercise II – Σαύλου composition before looking at key or other Learner’s attempts.
EDIT
Comparing my version with that of jeidsath I can see for myself that there are two corrections I need:
ὀρῶ πολλοὺς κύκνους οἳ ὃς εισι λαμπροὶ καὶ λευκοὶ.
μικρὸν πλοῖον ἐστὶ ἐπὶ τῇ λίμνῃ.