# Catena Aurea: Mt. VI, 16 **URL:** \ **Category:** Medieval and Neo-Latin\ **Created:** [March 4, 2026, 10:49pm UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/catena-aurea-mt-vi-16/31074 "2026-03-04T22:49:47Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![IoannesSanctaeMariae](https://www.textkit.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/a87d85/32.png) [@IoannesSanctaeMariae](https://www.textkit.com/u/IoannesSanctaeMariae)\ **Post date:** [March 4, 2026, 10:49pm UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/catena-aurea-mt-vi-16/31074/1 "2026-03-04T22:49:47Z")
In the following passage, > _Quia oratio illa iam fortis est, quae fit in spiritu humili et corde contrito; qui autem deliciis fruitur, spiritum humilem et cor contritum habere non potest; manifestum est quoniam oratio sine ieiunio gracilis est et infirma: et ideo quicumque pro aliqua necessitate voluerunt orare, ieiunium adiutorium est orationis._ Is that “manifestum est quoniam oratio sine ieiunio gracilis est et infirma“ a parenthesis? It does not seem to have any relation to any other clause in this sentence. Also: what is that “ieiunium adiutorium est orationis“ doing? It also does not seem to relate to any other clause, and “et ideo quicumque pro aliqua necessitate voluerunt orare“ has no meaning alone (And because of that everyone who prayed for some need…). “Adiutorium est“ made me remember a deponent verb, but I did not find the verb “adiutorior“ or something like that, so unless it is an extremely rare word (or the form I supposed to be the present is not actually it), I think it is not the case. Here is the text, if you want to take a closer look: [Thomas de Aquino, Catena aurea in Matthaeum, cap. 5-9](https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/cmt05.html#85409) ---
**Author:** ![bedwere](https://www.textkit.com/user_avatar/www.textkit.com/bedwere/32/35_2.png) [@bedwere](https://www.textkit.com/u/bedwere)\ **Post date:** [March 4, 2026, 11:19pm UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/catena-aurea-mt-vi-16/31074/2 "2026-03-04T23:19:03Z")
> [@IoannesSanctaeMariae](#): > > Is that “manifestum est quoniam oratio sine ieiunio gracilis est et infirma“ a parenthesis? It stands on its on. Notice that in Classical Latin you would have accusative + infinitive, rather than quoniam + indicative. > [@IoannesSanctaeMariae](#): > > [Adiutorium](https://logeion.uchicago.edu/adiutorium) Check the dictionary for definition. Adiutorium est etc. is the apodosis of the protasis quicumque pro aliqua etc. ---
**Author:** ![IoannesSanctaeMariae](https://www.textkit.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/a87d85/32.png) [@IoannesSanctaeMariae](https://www.textkit.com/u/IoannesSanctaeMariae)\ **Post date:** [March 5, 2026, 10:18pm UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/catena-aurea-mt-vi-16/31074/3 "2026-03-05T22:18:48Z")
> [@bedwere](#): > > Adiutorium est etc. is the apodosis of the protasis quicumque pro aliqua etc. It is, then, a conditional sentence without “si“? As it were, “Ieiunium adiutorium est orationis, si quis pro aliqua necessitate voluit orare“, or something like that? ---
**Author:** ![bedwere](https://www.textkit.com/user_avatar/www.textkit.com/bedwere/32/35_2.png) [@bedwere](https://www.textkit.com/u/bedwere)\ **Post date:** [March 5, 2026, 10:43pm UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/catena-aurea-mt-vi-16/31074/4 "2026-03-05T22:43:21Z")
I have trouble classifying this clause (relative clause?) and I’m using the nomenclature for conditional sentences loosely., but what you wrote makes sense to me. ---
**Author:** ![mwh](https://www.textkit.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/6f9a4e/32.png) [@mwh](https://www.textkit.com/u/mwh)\ **Post date:** [March 6, 2026, 1:47am UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/catena-aurea-mt-vi-16/31074/5 "2026-03-06T01:47:09Z")
Isn’t it simply an indefinite relative clause? If we want an antecedent (but why should we?) we can easily understand e.g. eis or omnibus. The Athanasian creed similarly foregrounds the bare relative, with no dative: Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est ut teneat Catholicam fidem. (Take that, protestants!) ---
**Author:** ![Villanelle](https://www.textkit.com/user_avatar/www.textkit.com/villanelle/32/192_2.png) [@Villanelle](https://www.textkit.com/u/Villanelle)\ **Post date:** [March 6, 2026, 4:32am UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/catena-aurea-mt-vi-16/31074/6 "2026-03-06T04:32:42Z")
Quelle absurdite mon ami we Protestants are quite fine as we are thank you very much! :)😜 ---
**Author:** ![IoannesSanctaeMariae](https://www.textkit.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/i/a87d85/32.png) [@IoannesSanctaeMariae](https://www.textkit.com/u/IoannesSanctaeMariae)\ **Post date:** [March 6, 2026, 10:08am UTC](https://www.textkit.com/t/catena-aurea-mt-vi-16/31074/7 "2026-03-06T10:08:37Z")
Much thanks for the help!