Here’s some (more) Latin I’ve parsed and translated - from Orberg’s LLPSI cap XLII
Bellum Sabinum
Novissimum [nns] ab Sabinis [mabp] bellum [nns] ortum est [pf3s(nns)], multoque [adv] id maximum [nns] fuit [pf3s]
The latest war to arise from the Sabines was the longest.
Nihil enim per [+a] iram [fas] aut cupiditatem [fas] actum est, [pf3s(nns)]
It arose from nothing but anger and greed.
nec ostenderunt [pf3p] bellum [nas] prius [adv] quam intulerunt [pf3p].
neither did they declare war before they brought it.
Non solum vi [fabs], sed etiam dolo [mabs] usi sunt [pf3p(mnp)]:
Not only through strength but also through deceit..
Sp. Tarpeius [mns] arci [fds] Romanae [fds] praeerat [i3s]. Huius [mgs]
Spurius Tarpeius was governor of the Roman citadel. His
filia [fns] virgo [fns] forte [adv] aquam [fas] petitum [sup] extra
unmarried daughter happened to have gone to fetch water outside the walls
moenia [nap] ierat [pl3s]. Ei Tatius auro pollicendo persuasit ut
Tatius with the promise of gold persuaded her
Sabinos [map] armatos [map] in arcem [fas] acciperet [is3s].
to allow the armed Sabines into the citadel.
Accepti [pf3p(mnp)] Sabini [mnp] Tarpeiam [mas] necavere [pf3p]!
The invading Sabines slayed Tarpeius -
- seu ut arx [fns] potius [adv] vi [fabs] quam dolo [mabs] capta esse
- whether it was better that the citadel was seen to be taken by force
videretur [is3s] seu exempli [ngs] causa [fns] ne quis impune [adv]
than by deceit perhaps it provides a lesson that no one
patriam [fas] suam [fas] proderet [is3s]
should, with impunity,betray their country.
- I’m a little confused about the construction seu…seu. My sense is that the construction is something like ‘whether..or if..’ ?
Additur [pf3s] fabula [fns], Tarpeiam [mas] mercedem [fas] ab Sabinis [mabp]
The story grew that Tarpeius had demanded from the Sabines 'that which they
postulavisse [pfi] ‘id [nnp] quod in sinistris [fabp] manibus [fabp] haberent
had on their left hands’.
[is3s]’ (nam Sabini [mnp] aureas [fap] armillas [fap] magni [mgs] ponderis
(for the Sabines had braclets of great value on their left arms)
[ngs] bracchio [nds?] laevo [nds?] gemmatosque [map] anulos [map] habebant
and also rings with gem stones.
- not sure of construction ‘…braechio laevo…’ - is it dative of possession?
[i3p]); ergo Sabinos [map] pro aureis donis scuta in eam coniecisse!
Hence the Sabines instead of golden givts gathered their shields in one place.
- is the last line a figure of speech - instead of paying up they defended themselves?