how you would convince even the least intelligent of people, that it is not (characteristic) of the same person to believe in both spiritual and divine things, and also (characteristic) of the same person not to believe in either spirits, gods or heroes, there is no way
I know Greek negations don’t always work like you expect. But how do you explain this one? To me, it looks like it makes perfect sense if you just cut the bolded word out.
Not quite. I want “there is no way for you to persuade any man who has even a little sense that it is not possible for the same person …” from reading the Greek.
The new Oxford text drops the puzzling οὐ. So feel free to ignore it. The mss. on which the editors primarily base their text, however, all retain οὐ. A later ms. drops οὐ, but this may just be a happy conjecture, rather than preserving an alternative reading from a different tradition.