which featured the Ionic alphabet, officially introduced at Athens in 403 BCE
This was what got me started on the topic. I was curious why the alphabet poem featured the Ionic alphabet, while being written by a 5th century Athenian. [I imagine that the answer is that this dating is nonsense, along with the theory that it inspired Medea.] Here is Kaibel’s version with the notes.
ὁ δὲ Ἀθηναῖος Καλλίας (ἐζητοῦμεν γὰρ ἔτι πρότερον περὶ αὐτοῦ) μικρὸν ἔμπροσθεν γενόμενος τοῖς χρόνοις Στράττιδος ἐποίησε τὴν καλουμένην γραμματικὴν θεωρίαν οὕτω διατάξας. πρόλογος μὲν αὐτῆς ἐστιν ἐκ τῶν στοιχείων, ὃν χρὴ λέγειν [ἐκ τῶν στοιχείων] διαιροῦντας κατὰ τὰς παραγραφὰς καὶ τὴν τελευτὴν καταστροφικῶς ποιουμένους εἰς τἄλφα·
<..ἄλφα>, βῆτα, γάμμα, δέλτα, θεοῦ γὰρ εἶ,
ζῆτ᾿, ἦτα, θῆτ᾿, ἰῶτα, κάππα, λάβδα, μῦ,
νῦ, ξεῖ, τὸ οὖ, πεῖ, ῥῶ, τὸ σίγμα, ταῦ, <τὸ> ὖ,
παρὸν φεῖ χεῖ τε τῷ ψεῖ εἰς τὸ ὦ.
- 13 glossam del. Petitus 13 διαιροῦντα A: corr. Schw τὰς πάσασ γραφὰς A: corr. Petitus 15 fort. τὸ ἄλφα 15. 16 δέλτα εἶτα θῆτα θεοῦ γὰρ εἰγε ἰῶτα A: corr. Herm, qui praeterea πάρ᾽ pro γὰρ; θεοῦ γὰρ ἄλφα βῆτα γάμμα δέλτα εἶ Wilam
I don’t quite understand ὃν χρὴ λέγειν διαιροῦντας κατὰ τὰς παραγραφὰς καὶ τὴν τελευτὴν καταστροφικῶς ποιουμένους εἰς τἄλφα. What are the τὰς παραγραφὰς (marginal notes indicating speaker?) and what does it mean that it end by coming back around to ἄλφα?
I’m not really sure how to interpret γὰρ and εἰς in the song itself (although εἶ θεοῦ would apparently be the “Delphic epsilon”.)
Reconstructing from the notes, the version in our manuscripts should be the following, which seems like it could be reconstructed multiple ways. And there would be considerably more latitude if you didn’t stick with the Ionic alphabet.
εἰς τἄλφα, βῆτα, γάμμα, δέλτα εἶτα θῆτα θεοῦ γὰρ εἰγἐ ἰῶτα κάππα, λάμβδα, μῦ, νῦ, ξεῖ, τὸ οὖ, πῖ, ῥῶ, τὸ σίγμα, ταῦ, ὖ, παρὸν φῖ χῖ τε τῷ ψῖ εἰς τὸ ὦ.