I’m sure I should know this but sometimes I can’t understand why certain classes or subclasses of verbs are defined as such…
In LLPSI Orberg Cap XV orberg explains the 3rd conjugation as follows:
[3] Ut ‘dico dicimus’ declinantur verba quorum infinitivus desinit in ‘-ere’, praeter ea quae ‘-i-’ habent ante ‘-o’ et ‘-unt’, ut ‘facio faciunt’: accipere, aspicere, capere, facere, fugere, iacere, incipere, parere, cet.
Now here’s the thing. Why are these latter verbs exceptions? After all if the verb is ‘facio’ then surely you can just say that the stem ends in -i as opposed to, say, ‘g’ as in rego. What is the point of defining as an exception a verb which if we just regard the part before the ending as the end of the stem…is perfectly regular…?
Also what does Orberg mean by singling out ‘-o’ et ‘-unt’ when this verb has ‘i’ before all of its endings in the present tense…?
Is the point here that facio, facere doesn’t have an i in the infinitive…and so the stem cannot be said to end in ‘i’? I see that ‘i’ makes appearances in this verb depending upon tense etc… so I suppose the stem ends in ‘c’…