58cd

Post Reply
User avatar
Constantinus Philo
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1411
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 1:04 pm

58cd

Post by Constantinus Philo »

καθάπερ τοῦ λευκοῦ πέρι τότε ἔλεγον, κἂν εἰ σμικρόν, καθαρὸν δ᾽ εἴη, τοῦ πολλοῦ καὶ μὴ τοιούτου διαφέρειν, τούτῳ γ᾽ αὐτῷ τῷ ἀληθεστάτῳ
as I said then about whiteness, even if small, it was pure (apodotic δε), that it differed from what was numerous and not such, by this very truth.
Does this εἴη still depend on εἰ? Or, should I translate: if it was small and pure (connective δε), etc.
Semper Fidelis

User avatar
Constantinus Philo
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1411
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 1:04 pm

Re: 58cd

Post by Constantinus Philo »

probably, it is a connective δε.
Semper Fidelis

Post Reply