On pg. 182-183 of the workbook and pg. 33 of the answer key.
LESSON LXXIII
428.I.1. Bear! (sing.), they will bear, so that they may bear, they bear. 2. Bear! (pl.), so that they might bear, to have borne, they had borne. 3. We have borne, bearing, to have been borne, to bear. 4. When the boats approached the island, the foreigners, alarmed with terror, tried to retreat. 5. The Gauls were annoyed that they laid to waste the Roman fields. 6. Caesar ordered his allies not to make war upon their neighbors. 7. The scouts that ran into Caesar said that the army of the enemy, wearied with wounds, had betook itself to another place. 8. The enemy knew that the Romans lacked grain and that this issue would bring the greatest danger to Caesar. 9. After the equipment was brought to one spot, some of the soldiers crossed the river which was not far away. 10. The king encouraged these men to go to the oracle and to recount the things they heard to him. 11. Whom did the general put in charge of that legion? Publius was in charge of that legion. 12. When Caesar was in hither Gaul, frequent reports were brought to him and he was also informed by a letter that the Gauls gave hostages to each other.
II.1. Galli Caesaris sociis bellum inferent. 2. Audivimus Gallos Caesaris sociis bellum allaturos esse. 3. Publius illo proelio non intererat. 4. Certiores facti sumus Publium illo proelio non interesse. 5. Vir qui equitatui praeerat vulneratus est pedemque referre coepit. 6. Caesar cohorti te non praefecit ut exercitui calamitatem afferat.
Translation of D'Ooge's Lesson LXXIII
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:33 am
- bedwere
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5102
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: Didacopoli in California
- Contact:
Re: Translation of D'Ooge's Lesson LXXIII
Propertius wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:17 pm On pg. 182-183 of the workbook and pg. 33 of the answer key.
LESSON LXXIII
428.I.1. Bear! (sing.), they will bear, so that they may bear, they bear. 2. Bear! (pl.), so that they might bear, to have borne, they had borne. 3. We have borne, bearing, to have been borne, to bear. 4. When the boats approached the island, the foreigners, alarmed with terror, tried to retreat. 5. The Gauls were annoyed that the Romans laid waste to the fields. 6. Caesar ordered his allies not to make war upon their neighbors. 7. The scouts that ran into Caesar said that the army of the enemy, wearied with wounds, had betaken itself to another place. 8. The enemy knew that the Romans lacked grain and that this issue would bring the greatest danger to Caesar. 9. After the equipment was brought to one spot, some of the soldiers crossed the river which was not far away. 10. The king encouraged these men to go to the oracle and to recount the things they heard to him. 11. Whom did the general put in charge of that legion? Publius was in charge of that legion. 12. When Caesar was in the Gaul closer to us, frequent reports were brought to him and he was also informed by a letter that the Gauls gave hostages to each other.
II.1. Gallī Caesaris sociīs bellum īnferent. 2. Audīvimus Gallōs Caesaris sociīs bellum allātūrōs esse. 3. Pūblius illō proeliō nōn intererat. 4. Certiōrēs factī sumus Pūblium illō proeliō nōn interfuisse. 5. Vir quī equitātuī praeerat vulnerātus est pedemque referre (terga vertere) coepit. 6. Caesar cohortī tē nōn praefēcit ut exercituī calamitātem adferrēs (īnferrēs)
Corrections are welcome (especially for projects).
Blogger Profile My library at the Internet Archive
Meae editiones librorum. Αἱ ἐμαὶ ἐκδόσεις βίβλων.
Blogger Profile My library at the Internet Archive
Meae editiones librorum. Αἱ ἐμαὶ ἐκδόσεις βίβλων.
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:33 am
Re: Translation of D'Ooge's Lesson LXXIII
For sentence 4 of part II, shouldn't it be interesse since the main verb is in past tense already? The original reads:bedwere wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 12:29 amPropertius wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:17 pm On pg. 182-183 of the workbook and pg. 33 of the answer key.
LESSON LXXIII
428.I.1. Bear! (sing.), they will bear, so that they may bear, they bear. 2. Bear! (pl.), so that they might bear, to have borne, they had borne. 3. We have borne, bearing, to have been borne, to bear. 4. When the boats approached the island, the foreigners, alarmed with terror, tried to retreat. 5. The Gauls were annoyed that the Romans laid waste to the fields. 6. Caesar ordered his allies not to make war upon their neighbors. 7. The scouts that ran into Caesar said that the army of the enemy, wearied with wounds, had betaken itself to another place. 8. The enemy knew that the Romans lacked grain and that this issue would bring the greatest danger to Caesar. 9. After the equipment was brought to one spot, some of the soldiers crossed the river which was not far away. 10. The king encouraged these men to go to the oracle and to recount the things they heard to him. 11. Whom did the general put in charge of that legion? Publius was in charge of that legion. 12. When Caesar was in the Gaul closer to us, frequent reports were brought to him and he was also informed by a letter that the Gauls gave hostages to each other.
II.1. Gallī Caesaris sociīs bellum īnferent. 2. Audīvimus Gallōs Caesaris sociīs bellum allātūrōs esse. 3. Pūblius illō proeliō nōn intererat. 4. Certiōrēs factī sumus Pūblium illō proeliō nōn interfuisse. 5. Vir quī equitātuī praeerat vulnerātus est pedemque referre (terga vertere) coepit. 6. Caesar cohortī tē nōn praefēcit ut exercituī calamitātem adferrēs (īnferrēs)
We have been informed that Publius did not take part in that battle.
Wouldn't it be interfuisse if that bold part was:
had not taken part
Or does that only apply to indirect statements?
- bedwere
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5102
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: Didacopoli in California
- Contact:
Re: Translation of D'Ooge's Lesson LXXIII
According to my interpretation, here the main verb in the perfect indicates an act completed in the present time (the so called perfect proper vs. the aoristic perfect, which indicates a mere act in the past): we are now in the condition of being informed. The information regards the participation of Publius to a battle, a mere act in the past. Hence the sequence perfect indicative and perfect infinitive. It seems to me that D'Ooge is encouraging my interpretation through presenting first sentence 3.
Corrections are welcome (especially for projects).
Blogger Profile My library at the Internet Archive
Meae editiones librorum. Αἱ ἐμαὶ ἐκδόσεις βίβλων.
Blogger Profile My library at the Internet Archive
Meae editiones librorum. Αἱ ἐμαὶ ἐκδόσεις βίβλων.
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:33 am
Re: Translation of D'Ooge's Lesson LXXIII
That makes complete sense. My mistake.bedwere wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:19 pm According to my interpretation, here the main verb in the perfect indicates an act completed in the present time (the so called perfect proper vs. the aoristic perfect, which indicates a mere act in the past): we are now in the condition of being informed. The information regards the participation of Publius to a battle, a mere act in the past. Hence the sequence perfect indicative and perfect infinitive. It seems to me that D'Ooge is encouraging my interpretation through presenting first sentence 3.
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2022 3:15 pm
Re: Translation of D'Ooge's Lesson LXXIII
Yes, and it is explained at page 179 of D'Ooge:bedwere wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:19 pm According to my interpretation, here the main verb in the perfect indicates an act completed in the present time (the so called perfect proper vs. the aoristic perfect, which indicates a mere act in the past): we are now in the condition of being informed. The information regards the participation of Publius to a battle, a mere act in the past. Hence the sequence perfect indicative and perfect infinitive. It seems to me that D'Ooge is encouraging my interpretation through presenting first sentence 3.
417. Tenses of the Infinitive. When the sentences in § 415 were changed from the direct to the indirect form of statement, sunt became esse, erant became fuisse, and erunt became futuros esse.
418. ...NOTE. When translating into Latin an English indirect statement, first decide what tense of the indicative would have been used in the direct form. That will show you what tense of the infinitive to use in the indirect.
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2022 3:15 pm
Re: Translation of D'Ooge's Lesson LXXIII
Hi. I have a couple of questions:bedwere wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 12:29 amPropertius wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:17 pm On pg. 182-183 of the workbook and pg. 33 of the answer key.
LESSON LXXIII
428.I. 7. The scouts that ran into Caesar said that the army of the enemy, wearied with wounds, had betaken itself to another place.
II. 3. Pūblius illō proeliō nōn intererat. 4. Certiōrēs factī sumus Pūblium illō proeliō nōn interfuisse.
In I.7. In the Latin version we have "vulneribus defessum ". Does defessus take the dative?
In II.3 and II.4 intererat/interfuisse take the dative of the indirect object (D'Ooge p. 182). What is it "illo proelio" not "illi proelio", since the dative of illud is illi (illo is the ablative)?
- bedwere
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 5102
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: Didacopoli in California
- Contact:
Re: Translation of D'Ooge's Lesson LXXIII
1) It's ablative. Instrumental ablative, I believe.Anto wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 8:06 amHi. I have a couple of questions:bedwere wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 12:29 amPropertius wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:17 pm On pg. 182-183 of the workbook and pg. 33 of the answer key.
LESSON LXXIII
428.I. 7. The scouts that ran into Caesar said that the army of the enemy, wearied with wounds, had betaken itself to another place.
II. 3. Pūblius illō proeliō nōn intererat. 4. Certiōrēs factī sumus Pūblium illō proeliō nōn interfuisse.
In I.7. In the Latin version we have "vulneribus defessum ". Does defessus take the dative?
In II.3 and II.4 intererat/interfuisse take the dative of the indirect object (D'Ooge p. 182). What is it "illo proelio" not "illi proelio", since the dative of illud is illi (illo is the ablative)?
2) Good catch. Either we use the dative or in + ablative, but not ablative alone. I'll fix it soon.
Corrections are welcome (especially for projects).
Blogger Profile My library at the Internet Archive
Meae editiones librorum. Αἱ ἐμαὶ ἐκδόσεις βίβλων.
Blogger Profile My library at the Internet Archive
Meae editiones librorum. Αἱ ἐμαὶ ἐκδόσεις βίβλων.
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2022 3:15 pm