Loci Immutati #14

Are you learning Latin with Wheelock's Latin 6th Edition? Here's where you can meet other learners using this textbook. Use this board to ask questions and post your work for feedback.
Post Reply
tbearzhang
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:33 am
Location: Franciscopolis (aut Sanctus Franciscus) in California

Loci Immutati #14

Post by tbearzhang » Mon Nov 07, 2016 4:24 am

Original Sentence:

Nec esuriens Ptolemaeus ederat, cui cum peragranti Aegyptum, comitibus non consecutis cibarius in casa panis datus esset, nihil visum est illo pane iucundius.

My translation:

And Ptolemaeus had not eaten being hungry, to whom when wandering through Egypt, ordinary (coarse) bread had been given in (a) house not to his companions (who) followed, nothing seemed more pleasant than that bread.

Question:

a. What is the case of "comitibus non consecutis"?

In my translation I translated it as Dat. pl., i.e. the bread had been given to Ptolemaeus but not to his companions who followed. I thought about it being Abl. pl., thus "comitibus non consecutis" would be the agent of the action "datus est", but in this case it would require a preposition "ab", right?

b. What does this sentence mean?

I understand the general sense of the sentence, but am puzzled by the meaning of "comitibus non consecutis". Basically Ptolemaeus, when traveling through Egypt, was given coarse unrefined bread (when he was hungry) and he thought nothing was more pleasant. But where does "comitibus non consecutis" fit into the picture?
行勝於言
FACTA NON VERBA

User avatar
bedwere
Global Moderator
Posts: 3362
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: Didacopoli in California
Contact:

Re: Loci Immutati #14

Post by bedwere » Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:07 am

comitibus non consecutis is ablative absolute and not the agent of the action datus est. If that were the case, it would not have been ablative absolute but ablative with a/ab. With this in mind, it should make sense to you.

tbearzhang
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:33 am
Location: Franciscopolis (aut Sanctus Franciscus) in California

Re: Loci Immutati #14

Post by tbearzhang » Mon Nov 07, 2016 7:12 am

bedwere wrote:comitibus non consecutis is ablative absolute and not the agent of the action datus est. If that were the case, it would not have been ablative absolute but ablative with a/ab. With this in mind, it should make sense to you.
Thank you!

Yeah, I actually thought about the ablative absolute as I was typing the post...

I'm more used to the ablative absolute separated from the main sentence with a comma, but I guess it can be used without a comma as well.
行勝於言
FACTA NON VERBA

Post Reply