res futuras praedicenti

Here you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Latin, and more.
Post Reply
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1320
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:15 am

res futuras praedicenti

Post by pmda » Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:32 am

Nemo Cassandrae res futuras praedicenti credebat.

Orberg habet responsum quod super est in LLPSI exercitia pars ii.

I imagined that the dative object that no one believed would be the entire 'res futuras praedicenti'...

so it should read:

Nemo Cassandrae rebus futuris praedicenti credebat....

Or is it dative Cassandrae that is not being believed...? But then how does the sentence work. What are 'res futuras' objectives of....?

Textkit Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:42 am

Re: res futuras praedicenti

Post by Craig_Thomas » Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:07 am

Cassandrae is dative after credebat, and res futuras is the object of praedicenti: they didn't believe Cassandra when she spoke of things to come.

Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 460
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:26 am
Location: Japan

Re: res futuras praedicenti

Post by Junya » Sun Dec 16, 2012 6:52 pm

Nemo Cassandrae res futuras praedicenti credebat.
How about this explanation ?

Nemo : the subject of the sentence
Cassandrae : dative case, which credere takes as its object
res futuras : accusative case, which praedicere takes as its object
praedicenti : dative case of the participle which modifies Cassandrae (Cassandra foretelling, Cassandra who is foretelling)
credebat : the main verb and predicate of the sentence, the subject is nemo, the object is the dative case of Cassandra

Post Reply