Mark Anthony
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:49 pm
Mark Anthony
My name is John and I am a 60 year old Englishman who is trying to revive the classics of his childhood.
Can anyone tell me the cognomen of Mark Anthony, friend of Caesar and triumvir?
Marcus Antonius ?
Thanks,
John
Can anyone tell me the cognomen of Mark Anthony, friend of Caesar and triumvir?
Marcus Antonius ?
Thanks,
John
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 5:19 pm
- Location: Mijdrecht
- Contact:
- IreneY
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
- Location: U.S.A (not American though)
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:49 pm
Surely every Roman citizen would have been registered with their three names. Mark Anthony may not have come from the sort of patrician family like Julius Caesar, but he must have been a citizen.
Is there any evidence of any other leading Roman not having three names? I imagine mark Anthony's cognomen must have just been forgotten. I need convincing that he never had one at all!
John
Is there any evidence of any other leading Roman not having three names? I imagine mark Anthony's cognomen must have just been forgotten. I need convincing that he never had one at all!
John
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:42 am
- Location: MA
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:04 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:04 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Sorry, my mistake. The 'Creticus' part was for his dad only, I guess. Here's the answer to your question in German:
"Einige prominente Römer besaßen keinen Cognomen wie z.B. Gaius Marius und Marcus Antonius." Ingrid70 - you're brill!
Here's the German site:
http://www.lateinservice.de/referate/in ... menref.htm
Cheers,
Int
"Einige prominente Römer besaßen keinen Cognomen wie z.B. Gaius Marius und Marcus Antonius." Ingrid70 - you're brill!
Here's the German site:
http://www.lateinservice.de/referate/in ... menref.htm
Cheers,
Int
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:49 pm
Thanks for Gaius Marius; but surely even he must have had the three names otherwise he would not have been a citizen and would not have qualified as any sort of magistrate.
Perhaps a clue to the answer may lie in Cicero who usually refers to Gaius Julius Caesar as Gaius Caesar. If these references had been the only existing ones to Caesar, we would be asking the same question about him! Perhaps one day a new document will turn up which may fill this lacuna.
Perhaps a clue to the answer may lie in Cicero who usually refers to Gaius Julius Caesar as Gaius Caesar. If these references had been the only existing ones to Caesar, we would be asking the same question about him! Perhaps one day a new document will turn up which may fill this lacuna.
- IreneY
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
- Location: U.S.A (not American though)
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 5:19 pm
- Location: Mijdrecht
- Contact:
I studied ancient history and never heard of this prerequisite for citizenship or for magistrature. That doesn't mean it wasn't there ofcourse. Do you have a source?jgoldsmith wrote:Thanks for Gaius Marius; but surely even he must have had the three names otherwise he would not have been a citizen and would not have qualified as any sort of magistrate.
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:49 pm
Thanks for pointing out to me that regulations under the empire need not necessarily have been the same as under the republic.
I am still inclined to stick to my guns however.
Both Anthony and Marius were figures of the late republic and therefore it is not unreasonable to assume that many regulations were unchanged in the shortish time between their lives and the empire.
Rome had quite recently been engaged in the Social Wars with her neighbours; and was very touchy about who was in and who was out so far as citizenship was concerned. Official registration of some sort must have been important; and you have to go back a long way to find Romans having two instead of three official names. All of Marius' and Anthony's contemporary Romans seem to have had the full three names.
Of course the regulations may have been modified by one of the early emperors. I too would like to know if there is any evidence for or against. Such books as I have consulted suggest the three names were an essential part of citizenship registration, but whether this refers to imperial or republican practice (or both) I do not know.
I am still inclined to stick to my guns however.
Both Anthony and Marius were figures of the late republic and therefore it is not unreasonable to assume that many regulations were unchanged in the shortish time between their lives and the empire.
Rome had quite recently been engaged in the Social Wars with her neighbours; and was very touchy about who was in and who was out so far as citizenship was concerned. Official registration of some sort must have been important; and you have to go back a long way to find Romans having two instead of three official names. All of Marius' and Anthony's contemporary Romans seem to have had the full three names.
Of course the regulations may have been modified by one of the early emperors. I too would like to know if there is any evidence for or against. Such books as I have consulted suggest the three names were an essential part of citizenship registration, but whether this refers to imperial or republican practice (or both) I do not know.
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 5:19 pm
- Location: Mijdrecht
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:49 pm
Apologies for taking so long over my reply.
I'm afraid the books I consulted were mainly schoolboy textbooks which gave no great detail. The only one worth mentioning was the Oxford Classical Dictionary which however threw no new light on the problem.
Wikipedia gives quite a detailed article and assumes that Plebeian families in the late republic did not need the third name.
The best article I have been able to consult has been William Smith's Dictionary on the Lacus Curtius site. It is however very old. He gives two other instances of two-named Romans - Quintus Sertorius and Gn Pompeius (although I thought he was Strabo like his father). I hope I am not misrepresenting him, but it seems to me he does not give us chapter and verse concerning the law at the time of the late republic.
In other words we are left we started!
Please, someone, do give us the definitive answer, if there is one.
I'm afraid the books I consulted were mainly schoolboy textbooks which gave no great detail. The only one worth mentioning was the Oxford Classical Dictionary which however threw no new light on the problem.
Wikipedia gives quite a detailed article and assumes that Plebeian families in the late republic did not need the third name.
The best article I have been able to consult has been William Smith's Dictionary on the Lacus Curtius site. It is however very old. He gives two other instances of two-named Romans - Quintus Sertorius and Gn Pompeius (although I thought he was Strabo like his father). I hope I am not misrepresenting him, but it seems to me he does not give us chapter and verse concerning the law at the time of the late republic.
In other words we are left we started!
Please, someone, do give us the definitive answer, if there is one.
- IreneY
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
- Location: U.S.A (not American though)
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:20 pm
- Location: Lenexa, Kansas
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:20 pm
- Location: Lenexa, Kansas
There is an underscore between "roman" and "names" in this url, thus:
www.vroma.org/~bmcmanus/roman_names.html
Tim
www.vroma.org/~bmcmanus/roman_names.html
Tim
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 5:19 pm
- Location: Mijdrecht
- Contact:
Well, I haven't found any source yet that states that the cognomen was compulsory for a Roman citizen. I only found one reference stating that having a cognomen was a prerogative of a Roman citizen.jgoldsmith wrote:Please, someone, do give us the definitive answer, if there is one.
That's from browsing the net, I confess I didn't go to the library to browse through Roman legislation.
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 5:19 pm
- Location: Mijdrecht
- Contact: