Postpositive particles
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 722
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:04 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
Postpositive particles
What is the purpose of never placing postpositive particles first? How does this affect the sentence's meaning?
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 3:37 am
- Location: Mountain View
If you say in English "I am looking for a person tall wearing a shirt pink who owns a Japanese slow steel green car," the unusual word order doesn't change the nominal meaning (unless you argue that some of the adjectives are becoming adverbs), but I would be a bit confused if somebody said that to me. Same with postpositives in Greek - technically the meaning doesn't change when put elsewhere, but if they are put in a position where they don't belong, I would get confused, so rather than changing the meaning putting postpositives in the wrong place just obscures the meaning.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 3399
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
- Location: Madison, WI, USA
- Contact:
Re: Postpositive particles
I'm not sure it's best to say there's a purpose in this. Greek uses word order not for syntax but for what linguists call discourse planning — letting the speaker know what you're talking about, what the most salient new information is, etc. Some such languages, like Greek, use the beginning of the clause for special jobs, and in those languages postpostives seem to pop up regularly. It's as though they avoid wasting the first position on weaker connectives (thought that's a little speculative).vir litterarum wrote:What is the purpose of never placing postpositive particles first?
In any case, putting a postpostive first doesn't change the meaning, it's wrong — it never happens. Err... except for a few freaky cases of δή in Homer.
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/ — http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 12:14 am
- Location: California
Re: Postpositive particles
When Yoda speaks Attic, he puts the postpositives first.vir litterarum wrote:What is the purpose of never placing postpositive particles first? How does this affect the sentence's meaning?
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:10 am
- Location: Bournemouth, UK
There is no reason for postpositives to occupy the position they do, except for the fact that they do. It's rather like prepositions in English having to come before the noun they relate to. There is no reason for this except that they do and it would be wrong not to put them there. Japanese, for example, has postpositions which come after the nouns, but do the same job as English prepositions, so there is no universal need for it to be like this. It's just the way the language developed.
I'd just like to clarify my use of the word wrong. What I mean is that this is not the way the language normally works and to do otherwise would just cause confusion. In any language system, a user may have a very good reason for wanting to do something different, to cause a special effect: this is what makes / keeps languages alive. It all depends on your purpose.
I'd just like to clarify my use of the word wrong. What I mean is that this is not the way the language normally works and to do otherwise would just cause confusion. In any language system, a user may have a very good reason for wanting to do something different, to cause a special effect: this is what makes / keeps languages alive. It all depends on your purpose.