Das Y Chromosome

Philosophers and rhetoricians, Welcome!

Vem är dumare?

Flickor (girls)
1
10%
Pojkar
2
20%
Whiteoctaves mor
7
70%
 
Total votes: 10

ThomasGR
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 444
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 8:49 pm

Post by ThomasGR » Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:53 pm

I’m sure you can detect sarcasm, no one is questioning this, but can you hide it? That girl played with your emotions; that’s sure!

You could stay in the scene and with a bright smile in your face answer here with an equal if not greater irony, as if you didn’t know for sure and great pains in your face: “Is it not?” And embracing her in your huge arms, burst in great laughter. The exit was a sign of defeat, no doubt about that.

User avatar
Episcopus
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 8:57 pm

Post by Episcopus » Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:16 pm

haha you are funny
Last edited by Episcopus on Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ThomasGR
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 444
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 8:49 pm

Post by ThomasGR » Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:19 pm

Nope, you are again wrong.
The real problem lies not in their chromosomata, but in ours. Trust me on that. There is something wrong with our minds and our chromosomes command us to look things that don't exist and we don't perceive them as they really are. We see them as very lovely innocent creatures, that are very weak and have to be protected by us, and their ignorance, well they are by far away from any such things. Girls are devilish, evil things. A smile from her and your heart starts to beat high. Have you ever questioned yourself why this happens? They are evil witches, are masters of secret sciences and able to subjugate your mind to their commands. They pretend to be innocent and weak and very ignorant, but they are not. That's the only truth. :)

primitive
Textkit Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 11:27 pm
Location: Boston

Post by primitive » Wed Dec 15, 2004 2:35 am

uhm.... :lol:
phpbb

User avatar
Episcopus
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 8:57 pm

Post by Episcopus » Wed Dec 15, 2004 4:31 pm

Actually too much of them pretends to be intelligent and 'strong' and 'independent'. Then they come to me and know they can't step to me so they humbly revert to their real personalities. I can also control my heart beat if a girl is up on me. But then again if you wish to live why would you want to control yourself das Y Chromosome is a natural stimulant dieses Bischofs!
phpbb

User avatar
eleanor1183
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 1:03 am
Location: Kansas

Post by eleanor1183 » Wed Dec 15, 2004 5:32 pm

Ah, the eternal question of who is more intelligent, men or women?

Wait, no, that wasn't your question, though, was it? You were asking about boys and girls. In that case, the answer is neither.

In reading through your posts, and after helping my poor husband in grading the exams turned in by his pathetic college students I've come to the conclusion that 99.999999% of the humans on this planet under the age of 21 are dumb as a sack of hammers, regardless of their sex.

In the sample exchange, the supposed lack of knowledge regarding the relationship of China to Asia was cited as proof of the female's stupidity. I find this to be insufficient evidence for drawing such a conclusion, insofar as neither of the people in this exchange live in China or any other part of Asia. This exchange does, however, bring up a few points.

First, the fact that Asian girls are almost invariably perceived by Western males to be "hot". When I have asked young men to explain this attraction, at some point they admit that they like girls who are submissive. Let us set aside the discussion of whether such submissiveness in Asian girls is accurate - it is perceived, and the perception is an integral part of the attraction.

Second, in my experience, (as well as the experience of every other woman I've ever known) males of all ages are intimidated and therefore presumably turned off by any female they perceive as being more intelligent than themselves. When faced with the prospect of never getting a date, a girl with any intelligence can only respond by playing dumb. Her only other choice is to be true to herself and find herself without a date to the prom, thus condemning herself to a future as a humorless scholar. :(

Third, most of you young whippersnappers don't really know or care about where any place on earth is in relation to any other part. There are supposedly intelligent college students who were born in and are living in the state of Kansas who can't find it on a map of the United States. I'd be curious to know how many young folks in other places around the world could locate their own home on the globe.

I can hear most of you saying, oh boy, are Americans ever dumb. I'm afraid when it comes to younger people, I'd have to agree with you. (See my statement above regarding hammers...) The frightening part of all this is that one of the requirements for admission to a State university in Kansas is that the applicant has to have placed in the top third of their high-school graduating class. Upon hearing this, my poor beleagered husband exclaimed, "Good God! What must the other two-thirds be like!"

I would like to believe that Kansas is an exception and that graduating high-school seniors in the rest of the country are in better straits. Wrong. According to Department of Education statistics, Kansas is actually above average.

There are times when I truly despair for the future of my country... :cry:

But of course, anyone who lives in a factory can't be terribly bright, either... :D
phpbb

User avatar
Episcopus
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 8:57 pm

Post by Episcopus » Wed Dec 15, 2004 5:43 pm

My jaffa cake lodging is my business ! It is of choice. I could have gone to cambridge I swear !

Many young people yes are dull. But for God's sake this girl was NOT playing dumb.

My physics class is just all boys and 2 girls who don't know what's going on whereas the boys watch me predict sin values (sin 140 for example I said 0.65 today, and it was 0.64 on calculator) and explain why tan 90 is infinity, the girls just sit there and talk about christmas and ice skating.

Also girls act asif they be deep and caring for a boy's personality but in fact they are more shallow than boys. For example today I say hello to a random girl and she pokes my stomach and exclaims bloody hell you are on steroids! Then another one I see pokes my stomach and says ******* hell he has body armour. And now they do not stop looking at me. I am really not very nice to them at all. Not that I mind all these crazy compliments but it's indeed fully true that personality does not matter zum Y Chromosome. If you get an ugly boy giving a random girl arbitrate crinal strokes then they half of the time sue for sexual harrassment. With me they just ask me if I am smoking something.
phpbb

ThomasGR
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 444
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 8:49 pm

Post by ThomasGR » Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:07 pm

OMG , this a horrible situation you are trapped! :lol:
These girls are taking over your brain slice by slice and you still think they are innocent!!!!!

Kasper
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 799
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Kasper » Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:23 pm

I'm inclined to agree with Eleanor - although not entirely. Given the example of the inability to locate their home on a global map - the bishops's example of china's location: this are data issues, not processing.

I believe that to be "dumb" one lacks the ability to process data, not simply lack data. Whereas a person who has an enormous hard-disk is often considered to be smart, this is not necessarily so. Knowledge is not the same as intelligence, it is the product of the combination of the present data that defines one's intelligence.

Now indeed, Eleanor, people under 21 tend to seem dumb, because they lack data. This is not their fault as such however, it is a result of the data that is provided to them on a regular basis. e.g. I was watching this show on the succes of childrens' books like Harry Potter and The day my Bum Went Mad (or something like that). The glorious conclusion was that for a childrens book to be succesful (commercially that is), it must be fantastic, full of funny stories, but most of all: it must abandon every effort to teach children anything at all. Children don't want to learn, or so is the assumption, and will only buy what they want: ergo books without learning.

Further, it is an inevitable result of modern society that people become dumber - no, lack general data. Why? Specialisation. The enormous increase in specialisation means that for a person to be moderately succesful in one profession, they must spend an enormous amount of time studying just that one subject. This takes away time from the time to learn general things which are not immediately commercially viable, such as learning the location of either kansas or china.

Specialisation means less general knowledge. Continuing commercial viability demands increasing specialisation. As a community we will know more and more. As individuals less and less.

Ps. I vote for Whiteoctivia.
“Cum ego verbo utar,” Humpty Dumpty dixit voce contempta, “indicat illud quod optem – nec plus nec minus.”
“Est tamen rogatio” dixit Alice, “an efficere verba tot res indicare possis.”
“Rogatio est, “Humpty Dumpty responsit, “quae fiat magister – id cunctum est.”

User avatar
classicalclarinet
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 400
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:27 am
Location: Anc, AK, USA

Post by classicalclarinet » Thu Dec 16, 2004 3:08 am

Another example of rant => interesting and mind-deepning discussion. Ah, the beauty.

Post Reply