Hi to everyone
I am a begginer in latin and I am a little bit confused with the long syllables and the accent.
According to D'ooge a syllable is long “if it ends in a consonant which is followed by another consonant”, however according to other grammar books this is true for "any two consonants (except a mute with l or r)". So according to D'ooge the accent on tenebrae should be on the second E (tenEbrae),
while according to the others it should be on the first E (tEnebrae).
My question is who is right D'ooge or the others?
Thanks,
Mute with L or R
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 10:10 am
- Location: Bulgaria
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:16 pm
- Location: Baltimore
tenebrae
(references to D'Ooge)
Syllabification
vowels = 2
diphthongs = 1
syllables = 2 + 1 = 3
§ 9.1 A single consonant between two vowels goes with the second.
§ 9.2a A consonant followed by l or r goes with the l or r.
Thus: te-ne-brae
Quantity of Vowels
§ 12.2 A vowel is short before nt and nd, before final m or t, and, except
in words of one syllable, before final 1 or r.
But,
§ 12.4 Diphthongs are always long, and are not marked.
Quantity of Syllables
§ 13.2 A syllable is long,
a. If it contains a long vowel or a diphthong
Accent
§15 Words of more than two syllables are accented on the penult if the
penult is long.
Thus: te-NE-brae
What other source is this in conflict with?
Edit: Quick check of Perseus to get the vowel length of the second 'e'
tĕnē^brae
It's long, so §15 applies and it agrees with L+S.
(references to D'Ooge)
Syllabification
vowels = 2
diphthongs = 1
syllables = 2 + 1 = 3
§ 9.1 A single consonant between two vowels goes with the second.
§ 9.2a A consonant followed by l or r goes with the l or r.
Thus: te-ne-brae
Quantity of Vowels
§ 12.2 A vowel is short before nt and nd, before final m or t, and, except
in words of one syllable, before final 1 or r.
But,
§ 12.4 Diphthongs are always long, and are not marked.
Quantity of Syllables
§ 13.2 A syllable is long,
a. If it contains a long vowel or a diphthong
Accent
§15 Words of more than two syllables are accented on the penult if the
penult is long.
Thus: te-NE-brae
What other source is this in conflict with?
Edit: Quick check of Perseus to get the vowel length of the second 'e'
tĕnē^brae
It's long, so §15 applies and it agrees with L+S.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 6:29 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
See; A&G 11.c
C: A syllable containing a short vowel followed by a mute before l or r is properly short, but may be used as long in verse. Such a syllable is said to be common.
NOTE 1.--In syllables long by position, but having a short vowel, the length is partly due to the first of the consonants, which stands in the same syllable with the vowel. In syllables of "common"quantity (as the first syllable of patrem) the ordinary pronunciation was pa-trem, but in verse pat-rem was allowed so that the syllable could become long.
Ingrid
C: A syllable containing a short vowel followed by a mute before l or r is properly short, but may be used as long in verse. Such a syllable is said to be common.
NOTE 1.--In syllables long by position, but having a short vowel, the length is partly due to the first of the consonants, which stands in the same syllable with the vowel. In syllables of "common"quantity (as the first syllable of patrem) the ordinary pronunciation was pa-trem, but in verse pat-rem was allowed so that the syllable could become long.
Ingrid
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:16 pm
- Location: Baltimore
Right, I saw that and it is somewhat the same in Bennett.
Except, who says the vowel is short? L+S says it's long.
I don't like that this happens right off in a beginner's book like BLB. Initially, I thought a "common" vowels were just poetic until I came across this:
Bennett:
Except, who says the vowel is short? L+S says it's long.
I don't like that this happens right off in a beginner's book like BLB. Initially, I thought a "common" vowels were just poetic until I came across this:
Bennett:
Both of these words (agri, volucris) are changed forms from their base word (ager, volucer) resulting in the insertion of mute+r. The vowel length changes as a result and L+S has volucris with a long u. Both seem to be poetical in usage though.§ 5.B
Sometimes a syllable varies in quantity, viz. when its vowel is short and is followed by a mute with l or r, i.e. pl, cl, tl; pr, cr, tr, etc.; as in agri, volucris In prose they were regularly short, but in verse they might be treated as ling at the option of the poet.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 6:29 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:16 pm
- Location: Baltimore
OK. It's just that it isn't short; it's long. At least according to the Lewis and Short dictionary. tenēbraeAccording to my grammar, if the vowel before the muta + liquida is short,
it stays short;...
If the vowel can be considered "common"...it's the syllable length that can be used as short or long as the poet wishes.
The A+G section quoted: "A syllable containing a short vowel followed by a mute before l or r..."
It's not short. So the vowel shouldn't be "common"
"If the vowel is long by nature (e.g. salubris), the syllable is always long."
How do you get the vowel u in salubris to be long by nature?
A+G § 9
a. Before another vowel? no
b. diphthong? no
c. contraction? no.
d. before ns, nf, gn? no
I have to look it up.
When I look up tenebrae, the second e is a long vowel. The second syllable is also marked as long. The vowel doesn't fit the requirements for a "common" vowel.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:16 pm
- Location: Baltimore
-
- Textkit Member
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 8:40 pm
- Location: oupou
- Contact: