Septuagint Psalm 106/107

Are you learning Koine Greek, the Greek of the New Testament and most other post-classical Greek texts? Whatever your level, use this forum to discuss all things Koine, Biblical or otherwise, including grammar, textbook talk, difficult passages, and more.
Post Reply
bingley
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 640
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 10:04 am
Location: Jakarta

Septuagint Psalm 106/107

Post by bingley » Wed Mar 03, 2004 5:15 am

Verse 24:

[face=SPIonic]au)toi ei)/dosan ta\ e)/rga kuri/ou kai\ ta\ qauma/sia au)tou= e)n tw|= buqw=| [/face]


What is [face=SPIonic]ei)/dosan [/face] ? I assume it's from [face=SPIonic] o(ra/w[/face] , but I can't parse it -- and nor can Perseus!

User avatar
klewlis
Global Moderator
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:48 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Post by klewlis » Wed Mar 03, 2004 6:05 am

Logos says it is Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Person Plural.

bingley
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 640
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 10:04 am
Location: Jakarta

Post by bingley » Wed Mar 03, 2004 7:12 am

Shouldn't that be [face=SPIonic]ei)/don [/face] ?

User avatar
klewlis
Global Moderator
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:48 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Post by klewlis » Wed Mar 03, 2004 4:32 pm

perhaps both forms were used at different times... eidosan does have a more regular form for an aorist anyway. :)

User avatar
Skylax
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:18 am
Location: Belgium

Post by Skylax » Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:44 pm

In Koine Greek, the ending [face=SPIonic]-san[/face] was widely used. So could the 3rd person plural aorist II (or even imperfect) indicative active be distinguished from the 1st person singular : Chantraine, Morphologie historique du grec, mentions [face=SPIonic]u(pelamba/nosan, a)ph/lqosan, ei)/xosan, e)dokou=san[/face] instead of [face=SPIonic]u(pela/mbanon, a)ph=lqon, ei)=xon, e)do/koun[/face].

bingley
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 640
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 10:04 am
Location: Jakarta

Post by bingley » Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:57 pm

Good, I'm all in favour of disambiguation.

Post Reply