Which Latin Text is your Primary Learning Tool?

Here you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Latin, and more.
Post Reply

Which Latin Reader or Grammar is your Primary Learning Tool?

Lingua Latina, Orberg
10
31%
Cambridge Latin Course
2
6%
Wheelock's Latin
9
28%
Oxford Latin Course
2
6%
Latin for Beginners, D'Ooge
6
19%
New Latin Grammar, Allen & Greenough
2
6%
A Latin Grammar, Bennett
0
No votes
Reading Latin, Jones & Sidwell
1
3%
Aeneas to Augustus: A Begnning Latin Reader For College Students
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 32

mfranks
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Seattle, Washington Area

Which Latin Text is your Primary Learning Tool?

Post by mfranks » Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:16 pm

Since not many people seem to be interested in creating a new LL Forum, I am curious what Text Books visitors to this site are using as their primary Text for leaning Latin.
I have combined both Readers and Grammars. You could always vote twice if you use both equally.

Cheers,

Mark

PS: I had "Other" as a choice... but I must have hit a limit or a glitch... If a moderarter could edit this to get "other" back into the Poll, I would appreciate it.

bellum paxque
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 718
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:29 pm
Location: nanun Hanguge issoyo (in Korea sum)
Contact:

Post by bellum paxque » Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:09 am

A combination of multiple sources - the Vulgate, Lingua Latina, Wheelock's, and - an option you didn't post - Moreland & Fleischer's Latin, an Intensive Course. If I had to single one of those out, it'd be M&F's. I probably spent the most time with that one, and completed the exercises the most thoroughly of them all.

I'll be curious to see the results of the poll.

David

Carola
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 12:34 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by Carola » Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:21 am

At the moment I am very into D'Ooge, being part of the study group, but I would have to say the most useful books are all the study note booklets we were given at University of New England (the Australian one!) when I was studying. They were very complete, clear and easy to read.

My biggest problem with D'Ooge is the ghastly translation exercises - they give the impression the Romans did nothing but fight. Maybe they were meant to grip the interest of 12 year old boys? Apart from that the textbook moves along in a reasonable way. Perhaps it should be rewritten with a wider selection of topics for translation, as the current ones don't give an accurate picture of the depth of Latin literature. At university we moved onto poetry fairly early, even if some of the tricky bits had to be explained. This gave us all a sense of getting into "real" Latin.
phpbb

User avatar
GlottalGreekGeek
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 903
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 3:37 am
Location: Mountain View

Post by GlottalGreekGeek » Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:32 am

I don't think you can vote mutiple times on a poll.

Anyway, since I'm not studying Latin at all, I'd happily volunteer my vote for anybody who desperately wants to vote twice.

User avatar
edonnelly
Administrator
Posts: 988
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Music City, USA
Contact:

Post by edonnelly » Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:30 pm

I'd be curious to hear from the person using Allen & Greenough -- that seems like a tough way to do it unless you're already pretty good at Latin and just trying to pick up bits and pieces.

I hadn't heard of the Aeneas to Augustus book. Has anyone tried it (even if it's not your primary text)?
The lists:
G'Oogle and the Internet Pharrchive - 1100 or so free Latin and Greek books.
DownLOEBables - Free books from the Loeb Classical Library

Ulpianus
Textkit Member
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Ulpianus » Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:15 pm

I haven't voted, because the poll suggests that it is interested to find out what is currently being used, and it's 20 years since I last "used" a textbook.

But when I did learn (at school) we used the Cambridge Latin Course until we were 16, and thereafter just a selection of texts with notes, which ranged from the quite-old to the absolutely amazingly old (and not necessarily any the worse for that). For grammar we used Kennedy.

Personally, I wouldn't recommend the Cambridge Latin Course to any independent learner. It's not that it's a bad course (though like them all it has its faults), but it really needs a teacher's input.

CharlesH
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:14 am

Post by CharlesH » Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:21 pm

Primary: Lingua Latina (plus Latine Disco and Colloquia Personarum)

Secondary: Wheelock's Latin

Charles

Amaranta
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 6:24 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Post by Amaranta » Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:35 pm

For class I have Learn To Read Latin, Keller and Russell. I also fiddle about with D'Ooge. Carola, I think D'Ooge was meant as an introduction to reading Caesar, so that's why all the emphasis on war. Although I think translation exercises in general are ghastly albeit necessary to some degree. Mine are all either war, philosophy, or Cicero and his undying hatred of Catiline. :roll: I much prefer the glossed readings of "real" Latin in the textbook.
phpbb

Ulpianus
Textkit Member
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Ulpianus » Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:58 am

It doesn't seem such a bad plan to prepare people to read Caesar. I think he makes a good "first" author, because the syntax is quite simple and the vocabulary relatively small. And the history is really important.

User avatar
mariek
Global Moderator
Posts: 1387
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 11:19 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by mariek » Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:00 am

edonnelly wrote:I hadn't heard of the Aeneas to Augustus book. Has anyone tried it (even if it's not your primary text)?
I haven't tried it yet since I'm not up to that level yet (sigh). I saw this book a few years back and thought I had to get it when I'm ready. Unfortunately it is hard to find, and I have never seen it at any bookstore since then. :( I can however show you an excerpt from an old 1967/1971 version of the book, if you're interested, if you want to get a feel for it.

Post Reply