Medieval Latin Sigla, Ligatures, Diacritics, etc...
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
Medieval Latin Sigla, Ligatures, Diacritics, etc...
Anyone familiar with all the sigla, ligatures, diacritics, etc... of the Magna Carta?
1. The elongated "a" in gra[cia] and the little & above it (the familiar ampersand - doesn't look like the Latin ligature for "et" nor does "et" fit in anywhere)
2. The 7 between Norm[anniae] and Aquit[anniae] - well, some may not draw their sevens like that, but I do
3. I'm supposing the "3" at the end Abb[a]tib3 is a ligature for "us" (abbatibus) (edited: it actually looks more like the IPA symbol Ê’)
4. The -e in Hib[er]nie is, I suppose the shortened form of -ae; Hiberniae. Odd that the online transcription should give us thus Anglie, Hibernie, Normannie etc... (yeah, I know
As I go through the Magna Carta, I'll give more oddities as I see them.
1. The elongated "a" in gra[cia] and the little & above it (the familiar ampersand - doesn't look like the Latin ligature for "et" nor does "et" fit in anywhere)
2. The 7 between Norm[anniae] and Aquit[anniae] - well, some may not draw their sevens like that, but I do
3. I'm supposing the "3" at the end Abb[a]tib3 is a ligature for "us" (abbatibus) (edited: it actually looks more like the IPA symbol Ê’)
4. The -e in Hib[er]nie is, I suppose the shortened form of -ae; Hiberniae. Odd that the online transcription should give us thus Anglie, Hibernie, Normannie etc... (yeah, I know
As I go through the Magna Carta, I'll give more oddities as I see them.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:16 pm
- Location: Rantoul, IL USA
- Contact:
Re: Medieval Latin Sigla, Ligatures, Diacritics, etc...
I'll have a look if you can point me to a facsimile. I have some experience with medieval manuscript reading but I'm not an expert.Chris Weimer wrote:Anyone familiar with all the sigla, ligatures, diacritics, etc... of the Magna Carta?
That could be an "et" (ampersand). It's a recognized variant.2. The 7 between Norm[anniae] and Aquit[anniae] - well, some may not draw their sevens like that, but I do
I think that's where the IPA symbol came from. The handwritten form of "z" is based on it.3. I'm supposing the "3" at the end Abb[a]tib3 is a ligature for "us" (abbatibus) (edited: it actually looks more like the IPA symbol Ê’)
That's easy. Long "e" is a medieval spelling of classical "ae" which long since by then was pronounced the same, like French "ê". That's very common, as is "e" for "oe".4. The -e in Hib[er]nie is, I suppose the shortened form of -ae; Hiberniae. Odd that the online transcription should give us thus Anglie, Hibernie, Normannie etc... (yeah, I know
Kerastes
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
Re: Medieval Latin Sigla, Ligatures, Diacritics, etc...
I have a reprint from Lincoln, but you can view it online here.Kerastes wrote:I'll have a look if you can point me to a facsimile. I have some experience with medieval manuscript reading but I'm not an expert.Chris Weimer wrote:Anyone familiar with all the sigla, ligatures, diacritics, etc... of the Magna Carta?
Yeah, I noticed that it had to be an "et" after I posted this per other places it appears.That could be an "et" (ampersand). It's a recognized variant.
I did not know that. Interesting.I think that's where the IPA symbol came from. The handwritten form of "z" is based on it.
Any idea about the ampersand looking character above gra[cia]? Edited: actually, for some reason, my copy has that character, but the one hosted at the British Library doesn't. Odd.
Also, I don't suppose you would have any information anywhere about which manuscript was superior?
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:16 pm
- Location: Rantoul, IL USA
- Contact:
Re: Medieval Latin Sigla, Ligatures, Diacritics, etc...
Not sure.Chris Weimer wrote:Any idea about the ampersand looking character above gra[cia]?
Ah, you're looking for a critical commentary or apparatus criticus. You may be familiar with the concept of constructing a stemma. Based on scribal variants and errors it is possible to relate manuscripts like members of a family, even to reconstructing what lost prototypes may have been like. Then through provenance, antiquity, or internal consistency you can determine which manuscript is best.Also, I don't suppose you would have any information anywhere about which manuscript was superior?
I don't know anything about that for the Magna Charta. My field is Renaissance music. But my first two moves are usually Google and a nearby academic library.
Kerastes
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
Hey Kerastes,
Yes, I'm well aware of what a critical apparatus is. Heck, I've been working on one for the Gospel of Matthew for quite some time, and I was going to do one for Juvenal, but unfortunately I've been unable to acquire several needed books (far more expensive than anything Biblical). I hadn't even the foggiest clue about the Magna Carta - would such a short document with a very recent history have an extensive one? I'd probably be better off merely collecting pictures of the different manuscripts - there can't be that many, can there?
Yes, I'm well aware of what a critical apparatus is. Heck, I've been working on one for the Gospel of Matthew for quite some time, and I was going to do one for Juvenal, but unfortunately I've been unable to acquire several needed books (far more expensive than anything Biblical). I hadn't even the foggiest clue about the Magna Carta - would such a short document with a very recent history have an extensive one? I'd probably be better off merely collecting pictures of the different manuscripts - there can't be that many, can there?
- Lucus Eques
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:52 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
- Lucus Eques
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:52 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
The C changed depending on where the change took place, AFAIK. It was different from Spain to Germany and everwhere in between. I believe that the Latin in England was more or less pronounced the same as the Latin in Norman France. So the C would generally be hard before A, O, and U and soft like an S before E and I.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:18 am
- Location: Belgium
Re: Medieval Latin Sigla, Ligatures, Diacritics, etc...
I think this Ê’ can stand for any word ending. I already saw an "atqÊ’" standing for "atque". The proper abbreviation for "us" is a sort of inverted "c" (a "c" looking backwards), written above the line.Chris Weimer wrote: 3. I'm supposing the "3" at the end Abb[a]tib3 is a ligature for "us" (abbatibus) (edited: it actually looks more like the IPA symbol Ê’)
In turn, such an inverted "c", but bigger, at the beginning of a word, stands for "CON-".
A kind of little tilde above a letter stands effectively for a "m" or a "n". A line above a set of letters can also indicate an abbreviated word, e. g. dns with a line above is for Dominus
Moreover, a sort of "4" at the end of a word stands for the ending "-rum". There are also abbreviations for "per" "prae" and "pro" based on the letter "p" with little ornaments added.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:18 am
- Location: Belgium
- Lucus Eques
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:52 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 4:28 am
Really?Chris Weimer wrote:The C changed depending on where the change took place, AFAIK. It was different from Spain to Germany and everwhere in between. I believe that the Latin in England was more or less pronounced the same as the Latin in Norman France. So the C would generally be hard before A, O, and U and soft like an S before E and I.
The pronunciation guide that I have states that "c" in ecclesiastical is pronounced "ch" before the E or I sound.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:34 am
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:18 am
- Location: Belgium
Nothing, I think, at least at this place. The text reads only .Io[hann]es Dei gra[tia]... "John by the grace of God" (King &c.) Maybe could you find the same symbol elsewhere ?Chris Weimer wrote:I cut the little symbol out of the Magna Carta. This is from the Lincoln Cathedral manuscript. What is that thing?