Accents and Long Syllables

Here you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Latin, and more.
Post Reply
MyIlium
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:54 pm
Location: Somewhere far, far away

Accents and Long Syllables

Post by MyIlium »

I used to think that the long syllable was the same thing as an accent, but now I'm just confused.

These are the facts (I think) I've managed to garner.
1. The accent is most often on the long syllable.
2. The accent is NOT the same thing as a long syllable.
3. A word can have many long vowels, but only one of them will funtion as the "main" long vowel.
4. The accent or long syllable will always be on the penult or antepenult, and never anything else.
5. Somehow changing long syllables to short syllables and vice versa is significant in Latin poetry.

As I said, confused.

Dacicus
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 1:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

Post by Dacicus »

The accent is on the penult if it is long or if the word has only two syllables. Otherwise, it is on the antepenult.

A syllable is long if it contains a long vowel, a diphthong, or a vowel followed by two consonants.

That's a paraphrase from M&F.

EDIT:
I should respond to your points more directly.
1. The accent is most often on the long syllable.
It is always on one of the long syllables, unless the word has none. You have to use the rules above to determine which one.
2. The accent is NOT the same thing as a long syllable.
That's correct.
3. A word can have many long vowels, but only one of them will funtion as the "main" long vowel.
If by main you mean the one that is accented, yes.
4. The accent or long syllable will always be on the penult or antepenult, and never anything else.
Yes.
5. Somehow changing long syllables to short syllables and vice versa is significant in Latin poetry.
I don't know enough about Latin poetry, so I can't say.

ingrid70
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 6:29 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by ingrid70 »

Look at A&G for an explanation on vowel length and quantity:

http://www.textkit.com/files/AG_New_Lat ... df#page=16

Ingrid

Dingbats
Textkit Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by Dingbats »

4. The accent or long syllable will always be on the penult or antepenult, and never anything else.
Most often yes, but there are a few exceptions. Illuc, illic and some others have the accent on the last syllable. They used to be illuce and illice, and after the final e disappeared they were still accented in the same way.

Titus Marius Crispus
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 2:00 am
Location: San Antonio, TX, USA

Post by Titus Marius Crispus »

I read that the accent was on the penult unless the penult was short, in which case the accent was on the antepenult.

Timothy
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Baltimore

Post by Timothy »

Dingbats wrote: Most often yes, but there are a few exceptions. Illuc, illic and some others have the accent on the last syllable. They used to be illuce and illice, and after the final e disappeared they were still accented in the same way.
The original word illice has three syllables, the double consonant l attached to the second long ‘i’: i-llī´-ce with accent falling normally on the antepenult, (i-LEE-keh). According to A+G, when the final vowel was lost (and with it the last syllable) the accent would have fallen normally on the first syllable, as there are only two syllables left in the mutated word. This would have resulted in a very different sounding word.

I wonder if this was the case with all words that lost a syllable due to the mutation and if it is peculiar to those which lose a final open vowel.

MyIlium
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:54 pm
Location: Somewhere far, far away

Post by MyIlium »

Thanks, ya'll!

User avatar
benissimus
Global Moderator
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 4:32 am
Location: Berkeley, California
Contact:

Post by benissimus »

Timothy wrote:
Dingbats wrote: Most often yes, but there are a few exceptions. Illuc, illic and some others have the accent on the last syllable. They used to be illuce and illice, and after the final e disappeared they were still accented in the same way.
The original word illice has three syllables, the double consonant l attached to the second long ‘i’: i-llī´-ce with accent falling normally on the antepenult, (i-LEE-keh). According to A+G, when the final vowel was lost (and with it the last syllable) the accent would have fallen normally on the first syllable, as there are only two syllables left in the mutated word. This would have resulted in a very different sounding word.

I wonder if this was the case with all words that lost a syllable due to the mutation and if it is peculiar to those which lose a final open vowel.
It also sometimes happens in compounds of the irregular imperatives (dic, duc, fac, fer); i.e. satisfac, maledic, benedic, calefac, etc.
flebile nescio quid queritur lyra, flebile lingua murmurat exanimis, respondent flebile ripae

Dingbats
Textkit Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by Dingbats »

Oh, so it's satisfác etc.? That's one I didn't know about. :)

MyIlium
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:54 pm
Location: Somewhere far, far away

Post by MyIlium »

But the one thing that still confuses me is the role of syllable length in poetry. It seems that the Romans weren't conscious of /accent/ at all; syllable length was what determined the meter and stuff.

User avatar
benissimus
Global Moderator
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 4:32 am
Location: Berkeley, California
Contact:

Post by benissimus »

The original Roman poems, Saturnian metres, are thought to be based on accent. It was only after contact with the Greeks that they borrowed the practice of using syllable length to determine metre, which is perhaps not as well suited to Latin as it is to Greek. The accent would certainly have been apparent to Romans in the poetry, but it would not be the source of the rhythm.
flebile nescio quid queritur lyra, flebile lingua murmurat exanimis, respondent flebile ripae

MyIlium
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:54 pm
Location: Somewhere far, far away

Post by MyIlium »

::scribbles down notes:: How do you know so much?

Turpissimus
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Romford

Post by Turpissimus »

But the one thing that still confuses me is the role of syllable length in poetry. It seems that the Romans weren't conscious of /accent/ at all; syllable length was what determined the meter and stuff.
Syllable length is distinct from vowel length. A syllable with a long vowel or diphthong is always long, although if it comes at the end of a word it can be elided. A syllable with a short vowel is long if the syllable ends in a consonant. Generally clusters of two or more consonants are divided up so each syllable has one each. So "extollere" becomes "ex-tol-le-re" - two long and two short.

I think a nice short work - a couple of pages long - explaining how Roman meter works could be written by one of the bods here. I might try it myself, although I am hardly one to lecture others on the correct use of Latin.

There are, you see, quite a few rules which determine how composers of Latin verse put together their work.

-whether the second consonant in a cluster is liquid
-whether the word ends in a vowel, and is thus elided
-whether the word ends in "m", and is also elided
-where the breaks in the words fall.

All these factors determine how the verse fits together.

Post Reply