Pharr section 150 line 7

Are you reading Homeric Greek? Whether you are a total beginner or an advanced Homerist, here you can meet kindred spirits. Besides Homer, use this board for all things early Greek poetry.
Post Reply
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1890
Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 2:28 am
Location: Arthur Ontario Canada

Pharr section 150 line 7

Post by Bert » Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:05 am

I don't understand the form ἠγέροντο. I am quite certain it is from ἀγείρω and that it is 3rd person plural middle or passive but I don't know if it is aorist or imperfect. The aorist form is given as having and Epsilon and an Iota, and the imperfect is (usually ?) build on the present tense stem, so that means again with an Epsilon and a Iota. Is this a unusual form or am I going stir-crazy?

Textkit Zealot
Posts: 3399
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
Location: Madison, WI, USA

Post by annis » Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:54 am

Pharr has played a naughty trick, or at least has omitted important information here.

For mysterious reasons the middle aorist reduces the stem ‐ει‐ to ‐ε‐. Only consulting a Homeric dictionary makes this clear. Homer subjects poor ἀγείρω to many stem changes, including an aorist participle in ἀγρόμενος.

But you are correct to note that the imperfect is built on the present stem.
William S. Annis —
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;

User avatar
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 4:47 pm
Location: New York

Post by Paul » Thu Nov 13, 2003 5:26 am


This is a bit off topic. But as I've been dallying in morphology, here's a brief morphological aside on the word ἀγείρω: it seems to derive from the non-attested root ἀγέρ‐ιω (here read the iota as consonantal). In Attic-Ionic the combination rho + consonantal i causes loss of the i with lengthening of the preceding vowel. This gives rise to the 'e-grade' ablaut form ἀγείρω. The same root, losing its epsilon, yields the 'zero grade' ablaut form ἀγρόμενος.



Post Reply