reflexive partitive genitive; nostri or nostrum?

Here you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Latin, and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
1%homeless
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 440
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:21 am
Location: East Hollywood
Contact:

reflexive partitive genitive; nostri or nostrum?

Post by 1%homeless »

Part of ourselves. Pars nostri? ...or Pars nostrum?

If I were to use the first person plural reflexive in the partitive genitive sense would I use nostri or nostrum? I mean nostri is the reflexive form, but would one use the same form in the partive genitive case?

Magistra
Textkit Member
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 12:42 pm

Post by Magistra »

According to Allen & Greenough's section 295:

"b. The personal pronouns have two forms for the genitive plural, that in -um being used partitively (§ 346), and that in -í oftenest objectively (§ 348): -

* mâior vestrum, the elder of you.


* habétis ducem memorem vestrí, oblítum suí (Cat. iv. 19), you have a leader who thinks (is mindful) of you and forgets (is forgetful of) himself.


* pars nostrum, a part (i.e. some) of us."

Magistra

User avatar
1%homeless
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 440
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:21 am
Location: East Hollywood
Contact:

Post by 1%homeless »

* pars nostrum, a part (i.e. some) of us."
Yes, but the question remains, how do you translate "part of ourselves" into Latin? The reflexive form is nostri, but the case is the partitive genitive (i.e. nostrum). These forms are clashing each other and there has to be a way to reconcile them. Maybe add another pronoun?

Magistra
Textkit Member
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 12:42 pm

Post by Magistra »

Yes, but the question remains, how do you translate "part of ourselves" into Latin?
pars nostrum

This is using the reflexive/personal pronoun nos in the genitive case to indicate a "part of a whole", i.e. partitive genitive.

If you're going for more emphasis you could add ipsorum:

pars nostrum ipsorum

Magistra

User avatar
1%homeless
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 440
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:21 am
Location: East Hollywood
Contact:

Post by 1%homeless »

Thanks, that one was a doozy. The reason I was confused was because Wheelock only listed nostri/vestri in the reflexive pronouns list. There was no nostrum/vestrum. Since the whole personal pronouns are identical to the reflexive pronouns in the first and second persons, it probably is just implied and that we should know that a nostrum/vestrum exist for the reflexive pronouns. :-)

Maybe I should've used D'ooge? :)

Straight from D'ooge's book:

"281. The Reflexive Pronouns. The personal pronouns ego and tu may be used in the predicate as reflexives."

:lol:

Episcopus
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 8:57 pm

Post by Episcopus »

Yes and the se sui sibi se are special reflexives third person :)

User avatar
benissimus
Global Moderator
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 4:32 am
Location: Berkeley, California
Contact:

Post by benissimus »

My Wheelock did list all of the genitives, perhaps you have an old edition.
flebile nescio quid queritur lyra, flebile lingua murmurat exanimis, respondent flebile ripae

Moerus
Textkit Fan
Posts: 281
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Lovanium - Leuven (Belgium)

Post by Moerus »

The personal and possesive pronouns make only a difference between reflexivity and non-reflexivity in the third person: suus / eius and sui / is, ea, id. In the first and second person we have only one form: noster and vester, meus and tuus, etc. can be used in a reflexive or non-reflexive way. So you can say pars nostrum or pars omnium nostrum.

User avatar
1%homeless
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 440
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:21 am
Location: East Hollywood
Contact:

Post by 1%homeless »

My Wheelock did list all of the genitives, perhaps you have an old edition.
Nope, I have the sixth edition. The reflexive pronouns list on page 83 doesn't have nostrum/vestrum.

Fay
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 3:22 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

Post by Fay »

1%homeless wrote:
My Wheelock did list all of the genitives, perhaps you have an old edition.
Nope, I have the sixth edition. The reflexive pronouns list on page 83 doesn't have nostrum/vestrum.
On pg. 68 of Wheelock both nostrum and nostri are listed. Since the personal pronouns for 1st person/2nd person remain the same for reflexive pronouns, the editors might had left nostrum out assuming we know both form of the genitive.

I remembered my magistra had said about something about one is used more frequently than the other....but I forgot which one. :?:

User avatar
benissimus
Global Moderator
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 4:32 am
Location: Berkeley, California
Contact:

Post by benissimus »

Yeah, it's definitely on page 68. This isn't necessarily a reflexive concept, so I don't see why it would have to be reiterated in that chapter.
flebile nescio quid queritur lyra, flebile lingua murmurat exanimis, respondent flebile ripae

User avatar
1%homeless
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 440
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:21 am
Location: East Hollywood
Contact:

Post by 1%homeless »

the editors might had left nostrum out assuming we know both form of the genitive.
and I said...
Since the whole personal pronouns are identical to the reflexive pronouns in the first and second persons, it probably is just implied and that we should know that a nostrum/vestrum exist for the reflexive pronouns.
:D

User avatar
1%homeless
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 440
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:21 am
Location: East Hollywood
Contact:

Post by 1%homeless »

This isn't necessarily a reflexive concept, so I don't see why it would have to be reiterated in that chapter.
Yeah, but some of us beginners are slooooww... and we need reiteration. :) In my opinion, Wheelock should have either listed a complete reflexive list or explained it without a list like D'ooge.

mikhaw20
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:26 pm

Re: reflexive partitive genitive; nostri or nostrum?

Post by mikhaw20 »

So Wheelock gives nostri / vestri as reflexives, and (6th edition in a footnote, but 7th edition takes it out) lets you know that nostri / vestri is also appropriate for objective genitives (fear of us), but nostrum / vestrum are for partitive genitives (part of us).

So basically no problem if it's an objective; "We have fear of ourselves" = Habemus timorem nostri.

I guess the problem comes up when it's something like "We fear part of ourselves"?

Would that actually mean that we fear a physical part of ourselves in the sense of e.g. our demon-possessed hands, or would it mean it in the sense of we (Samantha, Bob, Mike, Rasputin, and Lucrezia Borgia) fear part (as in a section) of ourselves (Rasputin and Lucrezia Borgia)?

It seems like there must be a way to distinguish those two things, and I'd be interested in knowing if the distinction solves the original problem.

Post Reply