Contract imperatives and accent.

Here you can discuss all things Ancient Greek. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Greek, and more.
Post Reply
paulbarnes
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:41 am

Contract imperatives and accent.

Post by paulbarnes »

Hello all,

Quick (and likely silly) questions:

Why do contract imperatives throw their (acute) accent back in a manner not consistent with the general rule [Smyth 171(b), 424(c)]:

eg: (e contract) ποιέ-ε = ποί-ει, but ποιέ-ει = ποι-εῖ, (o contract) δηλό-ετε = δηλοῦτε, but δηλό-ε = δήλ-ου ?

Also, why in the contract imperative ὁρ-ᾶτε does the circumflex stand on a short vowel?

Regards,
Paul

User avatar
IreneY
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 800
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
Location: U.S.A (not American though)
Contact:

Re: Contract imperatives and accent.

Post by IreneY »

Hello there! Welcome to the forums by the way :) Can I give you a hint? :wink: (look under the "big ten rules").


Why do you accent the uncontracted imperative so? It's ποίεε -> ποιεῖ, δήλοε -> δήλου. Apart from very specific cases, the accent goes as high as the last vowel will allow it to.

As for ὁρ-ᾶτε: The vowel is most definitely long; The vowels that result from a contraction are always long.

paulbarnes
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:41 am

Re: Contract imperatives and accent.

Post by paulbarnes »

Thank you very much for your prompt and helpful reply.

I am still uncertain why the accent on the stem is δήλο- when forming the imperative when it is δηλό- when forming a verb in the present tense?

Thank you again,
Paul

NateD26
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 789
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:14 am
Contact:

Re: Contract imperatives and accent.

Post by NateD26 »

Actually, both the present indicative and imperative have a recessive accent, as far back as
possible according to the quantity of the ultima.

δηλό-ο-μεν > δηλοῦμεν ; δήλο-ε > δήλου.
ὁρά-ω > ὁρῶ ; ὁρά-ε-τε > ὁρᾶτε.

See Smyth §423 and the exceptions in §424 ff.
Nate.

paulbarnes
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:41 am

Re: Contract imperatives and accent.

Post by paulbarnes »

Thanks Nate, I had glossed over the rules at Smyth §166 et seq, which your post brought to my attention, and which same information I should have gleaned from Irene's post. I must endeavour to be more careful in future.

Thank you all,
Paul

User avatar
jaihare
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 959
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:47 am
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Contact:

Re: Contract imperatives and accent.

Post by jaihare »

Nate's absolutely correct. Notice the endings that are added.

ποιε + ει - Here the long combination ει causes the accent to pull onto the ε.
ποιέ + ει > ποιεῖ - The accent remains on the syllable that was contracted.

ποιε + ε - Here the accent is not pulled toward the end of the word, since the vowel is short.
ποίε + ε > ποίει - The accent remains on the syllable before the contraction.

I think you'll find that it's consistent. The accent is placed on the syllable as if there were no contraction.

Uncontracted: ποιέω, ποιέει, ποιέεις, ποιέομεν, ποιέετε, ποιέουσι(ν)
Contracted: ποιῶ, ποιεῖ, ποιεῖ, ποιοῦμεν, ποιεῖτε, ποιοῦσι(ν)

In each case, the long vowel/diphthong pulls the accent back. This doesn't happen with the short vowel in the imperative singular.

Make sense? :)

Post Reply