Textkit Logo

Contract imperatives and accent.

Here's where you can discuss all things Ancient Greek. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get translation help and more!

Contract imperatives and accent.

Postby paulbarnes » Sun Feb 06, 2011 8:44 am

Hello all,

Quick (and likely silly) questions:

Why do contract imperatives throw their (acute) accent back in a manner not consistent with the general rule [Smyth 171(b), 424(c)]:

eg: (e contract) ποιέ-ε = ποί-ει, but ποιέ-ει = ποι-εῖ, (o contract) δηλό-ετε = δηλοῦτε, but δηλό-ε = δήλ-ου ?

Also, why in the contract imperative ὁρ-ᾶτε does the circumflex stand on a short vowel?

Regards,
Paul
paulbarnes
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:41 am

Re: Contract imperatives and accent.

Postby IreneY » Sun Feb 06, 2011 4:34 pm

Hello there! Welcome to the forums by the way :) Can I give you a hint? :wink: (look under the "big ten rules").


Why do you accent the uncontracted imperative so? It's ποίεε -> ποιεῖ, δήλοε -> δήλου. Apart from very specific cases, the accent goes as high as the last vowel will allow it to.

As for ὁρ-ᾶτε: The vowel is most definitely long; The vowels that result from a contraction are always long.
User avatar
IreneY
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
Location: U.S.A (not American though)

Re: Contract imperatives and accent.

Postby paulbarnes » Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:25 am

Thank you very much for your prompt and helpful reply.

I am still uncertain why the accent on the stem is δήλο- when forming the imperative when it is δηλό- when forming a verb in the present tense?

Thank you again,
Paul
paulbarnes
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:41 am

Re: Contract imperatives and accent.

Postby NateD26 » Mon Feb 07, 2011 9:57 am

Actually, both the present indicative and imperative have a recessive accent, as far back as
possible according to the quantity of the ultima.

δηλό-ο-μεν > δηλοῦμεν ; δήλο-ε > δήλου.
ὁρά-ω > ὁρῶ ; ὁρά-ε-τε > ὁρᾶτε.

See Smyth §423 and the exceptions in §424 ff.
Nate.
NateD26
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 787
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:14 am

Re: Contract imperatives and accent.

Postby paulbarnes » Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:53 pm

Thanks Nate, I had glossed over the rules at Smyth §166 et seq, which your post brought to my attention, and which same information I should have gleaned from Irene's post. I must endeavour to be more careful in future.

Thank you all,
Paul
paulbarnes
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 7:41 am

Re: Contract imperatives and accent.

Postby jaihare » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:17 am

Nate's absolutely correct. Notice the endings that are added.

ποιε + ει - Here the long combination ει causes the accent to pull onto the ε.
ποιέ + ει > ποιεῖ - The accent remains on the syllable that was contracted.

ποιε + ε - Here the accent is not pulled toward the end of the word, since the vowel is short.
ποίε + ε > ποίει - The accent remains on the syllable before the contraction.

I think you'll find that it's consistent. The accent is placed on the syllable as if there were no contraction.

Uncontracted: ποιέω, ποιέει, ποιέεις, ποιέομεν, ποιέετε, ποιέουσι(ν)
Contracted: ποιῶ, ποιεῖ, ποιεῖ, ποιοῦμεν, ποιεῖτε, ποιοῦσι(ν)

In each case, the long vowel/diphthong pulls the accent back. This doesn't happen with the short vowel in the imperative singular.

Make sense? :)
Jason Hare
jaihare@gmail.com

τοὺς θεοὺς εὔχομαί σοι διδόναι ὑγίειαν καὶ σωτηρίαν καὶ ἀγαθὰ πολλά.
User avatar
jaihare
Textkit Enthusiast
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:47 am
Location: Israel


Return to Learning Greek

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: spiphany and 42 guests