Textkit Logo

διακριβολογούμενος (Pl. Soph. 245 e)

Here's where you can discuss all things Ancient Greek. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get translation help and more!

διακριβολογούμενος (Pl. Soph. 245 e)

Postby Lavrentivs » Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:23 pm

I should like an etymological analysis of this word, which I have not found in the dictionary.
Lavrentivs
Textkit Fan
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 6:50 pm

Re: διακριβολογούμενος (Pl. Soph. 245 e)

Postby modus.irrealis » Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:46 pm

modus.irrealis
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:08 am
Location: Toronto

Re: διακριβολογούμενος (Pl. Soph. 245 e)

Postby Lavrentivs » Sun Oct 17, 2010 5:04 pm

Thanks! I would still like an etymological dissection, though.
Lavrentivs
Textkit Fan
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 6:50 pm

Re: διακριβολογούμενος (Pl. Soph. 245 e)

Postby NateD26 » Sun Oct 17, 2010 5:15 pm

maybe it's from διακριβῶς (διὰ+ἀκριβῶς) + λογεόμαι?
I don't know what λογεόμαι means though. If it has some relation to middle/pass of λέγω, why not λέγομαι?
Nate.
NateD26
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 787
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:14 am

Re: διακριβολογούμενος (Pl. Soph. 245 e)

Postby modus.irrealis » Sun Oct 17, 2010 5:27 pm

The LSJ doesn't seem to have a διακριβής / διακριβῶς though, so I'd guess it's δια- + ακριβoλογεομαι, with δια in its sense of "thoroughly" or "completely" and ακριβολογεομαι is ακριβ- + -λογεομαι = to be exact in investigation.

Smith seems to imply in 892 that the verbs with -λογεω are denominatives, so I guess really ακριβολογεομαι is formed from ακριβολογος = precise in argument (although I don't know if it's necessary for it to be historically true that the nominal form came first).
modus.irrealis
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:08 am
Location: Toronto

Re: διακριβολογούμενος (Pl. Soph. 245 e)

Postby NateD26 » Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:38 pm

modus.irrealis wrote:The LSJ doesn't seem to have a διακριβής / διακριβῶς though, so I'd guess it's δια- + ακριβoλογεομαι, with δια in its sense of "thoroughly" or "completely" and ακριβολογεομαι is ακριβ- + -λογεομαι = to be exact in investigation.

Smith seems to imply in 892 that the verbs with -λογεω are denominatives, so I guess really ακριβολογεομαι is formed from ακριβολογος = precise in argument (although I don't know if it's necessary for it to be historically true that the nominal form came first).

Many thanks for the reference, modus. I apologize for "inventing" the adverb διακριβῶς.
Nate.
NateD26
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 787
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:14 am


Return to Learning Greek

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media and 46 guests