I'm very new to Latin poetry, particularly trying to actually scan it, so forgive me if this question seems a bit ignorant. But Martial 3.5 doesn't seem to be using an elegaic couplet (I thought epigrams always did...) and I'm trying to figure out what it is, in fact, I'm looking at.
This is Martial 3.5:
Dum dōnās, Mācer, ānulōs puellīs
dēsistī, Mācer, ānulōs habēre.
(I assume the "a" in Mācer is long due to the apparent scansion.)
To me, this scans like this:
- - / - - / - - / u - u /- -
- - / - - / - - / u - u /- -
[the last syllable is short, but that's just a case of brevis in longo, right?]
In other words, it appears to be some kind of pentameter, each line consisting of spondees except for an amphibrach in the penultimate foot. So what form is this?
Scansion of Martial 3.5
- furrykef
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:18 am
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:23 pm
Re: Scansion of Martial 3.5
How do you get that scansion? I scan (taking both syllables of Macer as short*):furrykef wrote:This is Martial 3.5:
Dum dōnās, Mācer, ānulōs puellīs
dēsistī, Mācer, ānulōs habēre.
To me, this scans like this:
- - / - - / - - / u - u /- -
- - / - - / - - / u - u /- -
[the last syllable is short, but that's just a case of brevis in longo, right?]
Dum dō nās Ma ce rā nu lōs pu el līs
dē sis tī, Ma ce rā nu lōs ha bē re
- - - u u - u - u - -
- - - u u - u - u - -
Which fits Phalaecian hendecasyllabic (the eleven syllables are a bit of a clue):
x x / - u u / - u / - u / - x
I could be wrong, though - this is my first foray outside hexameter!
* in order to make it fit hendecasyllabic
- furrykef
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:18 am
Re: Scansion of Martial 3.5
Ah. As I said, I'm new to scanning poetry, so it's not surprising if I've misscanned it. I was thinking the "er" in "Macer" was heavy because it ended in a consonant; I'd forgotten that such syllables are only heavy when followed by another consonant.
It's nice to know we've found a form that fits. Interesting that it's still not an elegaic couplet, too...
It's nice to know we've found a form that fits. Interesting that it's still not an elegaic couplet, too...
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:21 am
- Location: NW Ohio USA
- Contact:
Re: Scansion of Martial 3.5
Greetings,
It scans as Phalaecian hendecasyllabic verse, a favorite form of Catullus and Martial.
Best,
dp
It scans as Phalaecian hendecasyllabic verse, a favorite form of Catullus and Martial.
Best,
dp
Similis sum folio de quo ludunt venti.
- furrykef
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:18 am
Re: Scansion of Martial 3.5
OK, thanks for the confirmation.