i-stem question

Here you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Latin, and more.
Post Reply
whalenburns
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 6:37 pm

i-stem question

Post by whalenburns »

Hello...my first post, but i'll keep the questions coming as they come to me. I am wondering why some nouns (dux, ducis; lux, lucis) are not i-stems while others with the same form are (arx, arcis). I had thought that those three words were not i-stems because they didn't take -tis in the genitive (nox, noctis; ars, artis), but arx, arcis defeated that rule. Can anyone clear this up? Also, if anyone has a list of the 3rd declension nouns like dux, ducis that aren't i-stems (assuming there aren't too many exceptions), i would appreciate it.

adrianus
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 3270
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:45 pm

Re: i-stem question

Post by adrianus »

Hi whalenburns and welcome.
Salve whalenburns et gratus nobis tuus adventus.

Compiled using my Verba software (based originally on Whitaker's Words data). Please advise, others, if there are mistakes.
Data per programma meum Verba nomine composita (quod programma in data ex Words apud Whitaker conditum est). Si errata animadvertistis, sodales, me moneatis, quaeso.

3rd declension nouns ending in x // Nomina tertiae declinationis per x litteram terminantia

Consonant stems // radices per consonantem

Masculine gender // masculini generis:
addax, adflictrix, afflictrix, Ambiorix, anthrax, apex, aquilex, aruspex, aspalax, aureax, aurifex, aurufex, berbex, bervex, box, calix, calyx, carnifex, carnufex, caudex, ceryx, ceyx, chalazophylax, chartophylax, chenalopex, Cingetorix, cnodax, coccyx, codex, corax, cordax, culex, culix, cyix, dapifex, decunx, dentex, dentix, dentrix, deunx, Dumnorix, dux, elix, Eporedorix, executrix, exsecutrix, extispex, fornix, frutex, haruspex, ibix, interrex, judex, lanx, latex, meddix, murex, onyx, opifex, opopanax, Orgetorix, oryx, panax, pantex, phoenix, podex, pollex, Pollux, pontifex, pontufex, pulex, pumex, quincunx, ramex, remex, rex, senex, septunx, sorex, storax, sturax, styrax, supplex, testatrix, thorax, Thraex, Thrax, Threx, tradux, Traex, Trax, Trex, Vercingetorix, vertex, vervex, vervex, vindex, vorax, vortex, irpex, hirpex, Felix, Beatrix, Ajax

Feminine gender // Feminini generis:
acceptrix, accusatrix, acquisitrix, actrix, adjutrix, admonitrix, adpendix, adquisitrix, adsentatrix, adsestrix, adsistrix, adultrix, adversatrix, aex, agitatrix, alopex, altrix, ambestrix, ammonitrix, anacampserox, appendix, arbitrix, argutatrix, arvix, assentatrix, assistrix, atriplex, balineatrix, balneatrix, balux, bellatrix, Bibrax, calabrix, calcendix, calumniatrix, cantrix, carex, cavillatrix, celox, cervix, choenix, cicatrix, circulatrix, circumspectatrix, cistellatrix, clacendix, coix, commendatrix, competitrix, compotrix, concitatrix, conditrix, conjectrix, conpetitrix, consectatrix, conservatrix, consiliatrix, consultrix, consupplicatrix, contemptrix, contemtrix, cornix, coturnix, coxendix, creatrix, creditrix, crux, cultrix, cylix, debitrix, defenstrix, deletrix, dominatrix, donatrix, educatrix, effectrix, expultrix, faex, fax, fellatrix, filix, forfex, fornax, forpex, frux, furnax, genetrix, gubernatrix, habitatrix, harvix, ilex, imitatrix, indagatrix, interfectrix, inventrix, janitrix, kalumniatrix, lectrix, lex, lodix, lux, matrix, mediatrix, meretrix, moderatrix, natrix, nix, nutrix, nux, opstetrix, oratrix, ornatrix, paelex, palux, pax, pelex, pellex, phalanx, pistrix, pix, potrix, praecantrix, praevaricatrix, prex, radix, rebellatrix, receptix, rumex, salix, saltatrix, sandyx, servatrix, solox, spectatrix, Sphinx, struix, supellex, tamarix, textrix, tomix, tonstrix, venatrix, venditrix, victrix, viviradix

Common gender // generis communis:
artifex, artufex, auspex, bombyx, calx, cojux, conjunx, conjux, cortex, grex, illex, index, inlex, limax, lynx, obex, perdix, silex, varix

Neuter gender // generis neutrius:
alex, allex, atriplex

I-stems // radices per i

Masculine gender // masculini generis: calx
Feminine gender // Feminini generis: arx, falx, faux, merx, nox
Common gender // communis generis: none // nullum
Neuter gender // Neutrius generis: none // nullum
I'm writing in Latin hoping for correction, and not because I'm confident in how I express myself. Latinè scribo ut ab omnibus corrigar, non quod confidenter me exprimam.

Eandir
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 6:32 pm

Re: i-stem question

Post by Eandir »

Hello!

I'll try to answer this one :). I think it depends on where the noun comes from. For a noun like "dux, ducis" or "rex, regis" it's clear that it's a consonant stem. But I've also learnt that there are some "mixed" nouns that work a bit like consonant stems and a bit like i-stems. We call them "mixtos" in Spanish (which means "mixed").

The rule they gave us is: "A noun is "mixed" when it has two consonants before the genitive in -is, and when it "seems" (seems but is not!) like a consonant stem.")

Actually look at the i-stems ending in -x adrianus gave you:

calx, arx, falx, faux, merx, nox

These presumably have genitives like these: calcis, arcis, falcis, (faucis?), mercis, noctis
The only one breaking my rule is faucis, a word I've never seen before... good enough :D! The remaining ones have all of them two consonants before their genitive -is.

"Mixed" nouns like these happen to make you remember words like "dux" because they end in -x as well (contracted from -cs or -cs < -cts).

Other "mixed" nouns will end in -s in the nominative instead of -x because there's no graphical contraction, like "mons, montis" or "dens, dentis" Haven't you wondered why these are i-stems and "virtus, virtutis" isn't? My rule here applies too.

So until you get a taste of which nouns are of what kind, I think if you follow that rule you won't have many problems. (Though probably someone can find an exception.)

Hope I didn't get it wrong and it helped :)

Imber Ranae
Textkit Member
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:06 am

Re: i-stem question

Post by Imber Ranae »

whalenburns wrote:Hello...my first post, but i'll keep the questions coming as they come to me. I am wondering why some nouns (dux, ducis; lux, lucis) are not i-stems while others with the same form are (arx, arcis). I had thought that those three words were not i-stems because they didn't take -tis in the genitive (nox, noctis; ars, artis), but arx, arcis defeated that rule. Can anyone clear this up? Also, if anyone has a list of the 3rd declension nouns like dux, ducis that aren't i-stems (assuming there aren't too many exceptions), i would appreciate it.
Though the rule isn't exactly hard and fast, the word arx doesn't defeat it. It's not the t in the stem that's important, but the number of consonants at the end of the stem, viz. two consonants in arx, arcis; nox, noctis; merx, mercis, etc., but only one in dux, ducis; lux, lucis; rex, regis; etc.

As per Adrian's list, faux is an exception.
Ex mala malo
bono malo uesci
quam ex bona malo
malo malo malo.

User avatar
furrykef
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 370
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:18 am

Re: i-stem question

Post by furrykef »

"Faux" is the only one in the list (that I can see; I didn't examine the list extremely closely) that has a diphthong before the "x", so that might be the reason.

It would seem another exception is "-nx" words, which become "-nc" or "-ng" in the genitive (maybe other things, too; I haven't checked). Phalanx, phalangis -- yet not i-stem. It might just be that they'e not i-stem because they're more than one syllable, whereas all the i-stem words are monosyllabic.

Words that end with -s will be i-stem, too, when the stem ends with two consonants. For example, dēns, dentis.
Founder of Learning Languages Through Video Games.

Delirant isti romani!

adrianus
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 3270
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:45 pm

Re: i-stem question

Post by adrianus »

Note also nix, nox, strix (and possibly more words ending in x) are mixed. My routines don't handle them as such (I forgot about that category).

Nota quoquè, nix, nox, strix nomina admixta sunt, et praetereà fortassìs alia verborum in x terminantium. Ea programmate meo non sic tractantur (illius generis oblitus sum).
I'm writing in Latin hoping for correction, and not because I'm confident in how I express myself. Latinè scribo ut ab omnibus corrigar, non quod confidenter me exprimam.

whalenburns
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 6:37 pm

Re: i-stem question

Post by whalenburns »

I don't know why I didn't pay attention to the two consonants - I had just read over that paragraph in wheelock's while trying to figure it out. It didn't get absorbed.

Imber Ranae
Textkit Member
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:06 am

Re: i-stem question

Post by Imber Ranae »

Allen and Greenough treats i-stems pretty exhaustively. See here.
Ex mala malo
bono malo uesci
quam ex bona malo
malo malo malo.

Post Reply