§560 - Syllables
- jaihare
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 959
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:47 am
- Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
- Contact:
§560 - Syllables
I notice the division of the word Ἀγαμέμνων is a little strange in §560. Pharr has it divided as:
Ἀγ-α-μέ-μνων
I would expect it to be different, especially the accented syllable. Is it correct as written here?
Thanks,
ΙΑΣΩΝ
P.S. Sorry if I ask too many questions. Like I said -- I'm eager!
Ἀγ-α-μέ-μνων
I would expect it to be different, especially the accented syllable. Is it correct as written here?
Thanks,
ΙΑΣΩΝ
P.S. Sorry if I ask too many questions. Like I said -- I'm eager!
Jason Hare
jason@thehebrewcafe.com
jason@thehebrewcafe.com
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 3399
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
- Location: Madison, WI, USA
- Contact:
Re: §560 - Syllables
This is odd. For the purposes of Homeric scansion, I would scan it as Ἀ-γα-μέμ-νων. I have no idea why Pharr is laying out syllabification for later Greek here.jaihare wrote:I notice the division of the word Ἀγαμέμνων is a little strange in §560. Pharr has it divided as:
Ἀγ-α-μέ-μνων
I would expect it to be different, especially the accented syllable. Is it correct as written here?
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/ — http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
- Lex
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:34 pm
- Location: A top-secret underground llama lair.
Re: §560 - Syllables
I have a general rule I follow when using Pharr: When you think that he is wrong, think again.jaihare wrote:I notice the division of the word Ἀγαμέμνων is a little strange in §560. Pharr has it divided as:
Ἀγ-α-μέ-μνων
I would expect it to be different, especially the accented syllable. Is it correct as written here?
That's not to say that he is never wrong, but he seems to have been one of those old school scholars that paid serious attention to details.
In Ἀγαμέμνων, I think he splits it the way he does because in §560, "In dividing words into syllables, ...combinations of consonants which can begin a word... are usually placed at the beginning of the syllable." Since μν can begin a word, the last syllable is -μνων, not -νων, as you would intuitively expect. Unfortunately, I can't find a list of combinations of consonants that can begin a word.
Hehehehe... Patience is a virtue, grasshopper!jaihare wrote:P.S. Sorry if I ask too many questions. Like I said -- I'm eager!
I, Lex Llama, super genius, will one day rule this planet! And then you'll rue the day you messed with me, you damned dirty apes!
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:08 am
- Location: Toronto
Re: §560 - Syllables
I think it's just a matter of syllabification meaning different things. There's syllabification in terms of how actual pronunciation is divided into syllables, which would be how annis did it, and is important for metre and so on, and then there's syllabification as part of the conventions for writing the language, which is what Pharr is doing, and is important for splitting words at the end of a line and so on. These don't have to be the same -- to steal an example from wikipedia, English learning is lear-ning in terms of pronunciation but learn-ing in terms of writing.
It's kind of like how we write words separately even though syllabification in terms of pronunciation ignores word boundaries, so for example, pronunciation-wise it would've been Ἀ-γα-μέμ-νω-νεσ-τί.
It's kind of like how we write words separately even though syllabification in terms of pronunciation ignores word boundaries, so for example, pronunciation-wise it would've been Ἀ-γα-μέμ-νω-νεσ-τί.
- Lex
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:34 pm
- Location: A top-secret underground llama lair.
Re: §560 - Syllables
If the Greeks used μν to start words, how do we know they didn't pronounce Ἀγαμέμνων with a syllable starting with μν?modus.irrealis wrote:...There's syllabification in terms of how actual pronunciation is divided into syllables, which would be how annis did it...
I don't say it that way.modus.irrealis wrote:...English learning is lear-ning in terms of pronunciation but learn-ing in terms of writing...
I thought scansion was all about the meter, not syllabification.annis wrote:This is odd. For the purposes of Homeric scansion, I would scan it as Ἀ-γα-μέμ-νων. I have no idea why Pharr is laying out syllabification for later Greek here.
Last edited by Lex on Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
I, Lex Llama, super genius, will one day rule this planet! And then you'll rue the day you messed with me, you damned dirty apes!
- jaihare
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 959
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:47 am
- Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
- Contact:
Re: §560 - Syllables
I do. I would naturally say lear-ning for regular pronunciation.Lex wrote:I don't say it that way.modus.irrealis wrote:...English learning is lear-ning in terms of pronunciation but learn-ing in terms of writing....
Jason Hare
jason@thehebrewcafe.com
jason@thehebrewcafe.com
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:08 am
- Location: Toronto
Re: §560 - Syllables
Maybe not for all then, but for lots of English speakers the two syllabifications are in conflict for this word -- check out http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=learning to see how they have learn-ing and [lur-ning].Lex wrote: I don't say it that way.
But metre is based on heavy/light (or long/short) syllables and these are related to syllabification because heavy syllables are those that end in either a long vowel, diphthong, or consonant. So the ο in τὸν ἄνδρα scans short because it's το-ναν-δρα but long in τὸν πατέρα because it's τον-πα-τε-ρα.annis wrote: I thought scansion was all about the meter, not syllabification.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:08 am
- Location: Toronto
Re: §560 - Syllables
Because the ε of Ἀγαμέμνων scans long so the μ must belong to the same syllable as the ε, otherwise the ε would scan short. It sounds a bit circular, but as far as I know, it's the explanation for these things.Lex wrote:If the Greeks used μν to start words, how do we know they didn't pronounce Ἀγαμέμνων with a syllable starting with μν?
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 3399
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
- Location: Madison, WI, USA
- Contact:
Re: §560 - Syllables
Yep. In Homer, when a stop and a resonant (ν, μ, λ, ρ) are next to each other, say in πατρός, the syllable — and the scansion — divides the syllable between them, πατ-ρός. In later forms of Greek verse (and most especially in Attic comedy, often believed to be the closest to colloquial language) it would be divided πα-τρός.modus.irrealis wrote:Because the ε of Ἀγαμέμνων scans long so the μ must belong to the same syllable as the ε, otherwise the ε would scan short. It sounds a bit circular, but as far as I know, it's the explanation for these things.
Except for typesetting, there is no particular reason for the budding Homerist to have to learn Attic syllabification, yet that is what Pharr gives in 560.
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/ — http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
- Lex
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:34 pm
- Location: A top-secret underground llama lair.
Re: §560 - Syllables
I'm still confused. My (mis?)understanding was that the syllable containing the ε in Ἀγαμέμνων is long by position (§522), since it's followed by two consonants. What I don't understand is why the second μ should be considered part of that syllable because the vowel is long. I didn't think it was necessary that the first following consonant (μ) be part of the same syllable, in order to affect the quality of the preceding vowel (ε).modus.irrealis wrote:Because the ε of Ἀγαμέμνων scans long so the μ must belong to the same syllable as the ε, otherwise the ε would scan short.
I, Lex Llama, super genius, will one day rule this planet! And then you'll rue the day you messed with me, you damned dirty apes!
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 3399
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
- Location: Madison, WI, USA
- Contact:
Re: §560 - Syllables
From the standpoint of phonetics it has to. The only way a naturally short vowel gets to be prosodically long (I prefer the terms light and heavy myself for syllables, to avoid confusion) is if it has a consonantal coda.Lex wrote:I'm still confused. My (mis?)understanding was that the syllable containing the ε in Ἀγαμέμνων is long by position (§522), since it's followed by two consonants. What I don't understand is why the μ should be considered part of that syllable because the vowel is long. I didn't think it was necessary that the first following consonant (μ) be part of the same syllable, in order to affect the quality of the preceding vowel (ε).
So, the syllable is long — not the vowel — because μ is at the end of it, not the other way around.
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/ — http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
- Lex
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:34 pm
- Location: A top-secret underground llama lair.
Re: §560 - Syllables
Yikes!annis wrote:From the standpoint of phonetics it has to. The only way a naturally short vowel gets to be prosodically long (I prefer the terms light and heavy myself for syllables, to avoid confusion) is if it has a consonantal coda.
So, the syllable is long — not the vowel — because μ is at the end of it, not the other way around.
Ok, so I was confusing long vowels and long syllables. The syllable containing the ε is long (or heavy), the vowel itself is not. I understand that much.
Now... You said "The only way a naturally short vowel gets to be prosodically long ... is if it has a consonantal coda." I take it a "consonantal coda" means a consonant following the vowel in the same syllable? I can't find anything about this in Pharr. Pharr says "(§522) It [a syllable] is long by position when its vowel is followed by two or more consonants, or by a double consonant. (§523) One or both of the consonants which make a syllable long by position may come in the following word." It says nothing about one of the following consonants being in the same syllable. Is this something I am missing in my reading of Pharr, or something that Pharr is missing?
I, Lex Llama, super genius, will one day rule this planet! And then you'll rue the day you messed with me, you damned dirty apes!
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 3399
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
- Location: Madison, WI, USA
- Contact:
Re: §560 - Syllables
I'm using the vocabulary of modern phonetics. A syllable has an onset, a nucleus and (optionally in most languages) a coda. In every language I'm aware of the only way a syllable becomes heavy is if either (1) the nucleus is long or (2) it has a coda (and one might argue that the ι and υ in diphthongs represent /j/ and /w/ codas).Lex wrote:Now... You said "The only way a naturally short vowel gets to be prosodically long ... is if it has a consonantal coda." I take it a "consonantal coda" means a consonant following the vowel in the same syllable? I can't find anything about this in Pharr.
Something Pharr is missing, whether on purpose or as a sign of the age of the book I'm not sure.Pharr says "(§522) It [a syllable] is long by position when its vowel is followed by two or more consonants, or by a double consonant. (§523) One or both of the consonants which make a syllable long by position may come in the following word." It says nothing about one of the following consonants being in the same syllable. Is this something I am missing in my reading of Pharr, or something that Pharr is missing?
In Homer Ἀγαμέμνων is always scanned uu--, which means to me it has to be syllabified — in any phonetic sense of that word — Ἀ-γα-μέμ-νων.
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/ — http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;