Greek or Latin
- gigas phoberos
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:02 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
Greek or Latin
I'm still a beginner in Greek, making good progress. But I often wonder if it would've been better to have chosen Latin instead. Seems like there would be many more books written in Latin than Classical Greek.
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:37 am
- gigas phoberos
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:02 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
- IreneY
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
- Location: U.S.A (not American though)
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:36 pm
- Location: Hafnia, Denmark
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:35 pm
- Location: Regina, SK; Canada
- Contact:
- Lucus Eques
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:52 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
I'm going to pretend that was a rhetorical question.IreneY wrote:But why do you need Latin or Greek for studying history?
As to your question, giga phobere, my own experience has been Latin into Greek, and Latin's familiarity relative to Greek has made acquiring Greek, which is very similar to Latin yet rather alien to English, much easier. Of course, you ought to learn both, since they are so rewarding to know.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 3399
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
- Location: Madison, WI, USA
- Contact:
As I've said many times before, and will doubtless say many times in the future, the authors you most want to read should cast the deciding vote on which language you study first.
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/ — http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 6:38 am
- Location: Seoul
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:08 am
- Location: Toronto
Why only a hundred years for Greek? Even for history, you have historians like Laonicus Chalcondyles writing in the 15th century about the fall of Constantinople -- and writing in Classical Greek that is.gigas phoberos wrote:Hello Bob,
My primary interest lays in reading history. Latin extends from the Roman period to the renaissance, good thousand years or so. Whereas Classical Greek about one hundred years or so.
I don't know, just some thoughts.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 6:38 am
- Location: Seoul
- Contact:
Actually, Albert Einstein did the job and I'm a physics teacher at a high school.jk0592 wrote:And physics also, I hope....and Isaac Newton et al. lure me to learn Latin
Einstein had reportedly hated his authoritarian classical education in Gymnasium. But I don't think he hated the classical language education so much. For he used loads of greek letters in his relativity papers later.
- IreneY
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
- Location: U.S.A (not American though)
- Contact:
Nope When it comes to studying history you either need to study a whole lot of different languages to be able to read the sources in their original form or you can be lazy and choose one of the many, wonderful translations out there.Lucus Eques wrote:I'm going to pretend that was a rhetorical question.IreneY wrote:But why do you need Latin or Greek for studying history?
I am not saying it's a bad thing. Far from it. I am just saying that if the primary reason is learning history and the others are of really secondary importance I don't see why go through the trouble of learning such a complicated language.
- gigas phoberos
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:02 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
Now you see? That's why I come here to learn from those who know much more than I! I didn't know about Laonicus Chalcondyles or any other "post classical" writer who wrote in Classical Greek. Thanks for the info.modus.irrealis wrote:Why only a hundred years for Greek? Even for history, you have historians like Laonicus Chalcondyles writing in the 15th century about the fall of Constantinople -- and writing in Classical Greek that is.gigas phoberos wrote:Hello Bob,
My primary interest lays in reading history. Latin extends from the Roman period to the renaissance, good thousand years or so. Whereas Classical Greek about one hundred years or so.
I don't know, just some thoughts.
Okay so let me re-phrase my question, is there a large and rich source of historical literature written in Classical Greek that continues after the classical period into the dark-ages, middle ages and renaissaince like there is for Latin?
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 3399
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
- Location: Madison, WI, USA
- Contact:
This is actually a trickier question than you might imagine. The cultivation of Classical Greek post-classically was highly dependent on the fortunes of the Roman, and then the Byzantine, empire. (See Atticism for ancient beginnings). When the empire was stable and doing well, education was good and something quite like classical Attic was produced. When education was at a low point, less such material was produced.gigas phoberos wrote:Okay so let me re-phrase my question, is there a large and rich source of historical literature written in Classical Greek that continues after the classical period into the dark-ages, middle ages and renaissaince like there is for Latin?
Except for a few commentaries on classical works, I've not really spent too much time on seriously post-classical, but Atticist, Greek. I get the impression this is still a largely untapped field.
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/ — http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:33 am
Given that the "Roman" period you cite includes about 1000 years of East Roman history - with much untranslated still- you will eventually need at least some medieval Greek. Attic is the best place to start.gigas phoberos wrote:Hello Bob,
My primary interest lays in reading history. Latin extends from the Roman period to the renaissance, good thousand years or so. Whereas Classical Greek about one hundred years or so.
I don't know, just some thoughts.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:04 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Mingshey,
I'm no physicist but as a young man I fell under the spell of Arthur Koestler's 'The Sleepwalkers' whose main hero is Kepler but which also highlights the role of Aristarchus as daddy of the heliocentric system. I still think of Aristarchus when I look at the night sky.
Is there a text relating to Aristarchus suitable for (near-)beginners?
Cheers,
Int
I'm no physicist but as a young man I fell under the spell of Arthur Koestler's 'The Sleepwalkers' whose main hero is Kepler but which also highlights the role of Aristarchus as daddy of the heliocentric system. I still think of Aristarchus when I look at the night sky.
Is there a text relating to Aristarchus suitable for (near-)beginners?
Cheers,
Int
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 6:38 am
- Location: Seoul
- Contact:
Hello, Interaxe!Interaxus wrote:Mingshey,
I'm no physicist but as a young man I fell under the spell of Arthur Koestler's 'The Sleepwalkers' whose main hero is Kepler but which also highlights the role of Aristarchus as daddy of the heliocentric system. I still think of Aristarchus when I look at the night sky.
Is there a text relating to Aristarchus suitable for (near-)beginners?
Cheers,
Int
I'm not sure what other beginners than me would want to learn about Aristarchus. But for a simple explanation about him there're the wikipedia articles on him and on his work.
And I, beginner myself, had been searching for his original work in Greek, and the Wilbourhall.org website provides one in PDF, along with links to other ancient mathematical works.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:04 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Mingshey:
Thanks a million for that great PDF, especially Aristarchus' Greek text + translation. It's a feast for a beginner like me. Words for 'moon', 'sun' and 'light' are like old friends.
A 3-hour partial eclipse of the moon last Saturday and the fact that lightning struck my laptop dead last Thursday (under my very nose, with a big flash!) only served to reinforce the fascination of celestial relationships and the sky we live in.
Seemingly, Aristarchus never witnessed an annular ('ring-encircled') solar eclipse. I call that interesting. The curious can read more about different types of solar eclipses at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse
Cheers,
Int
Thanks a million for that great PDF, especially Aristarchus' Greek text + translation. It's a feast for a beginner like me. Words for 'moon', 'sun' and 'light' are like old friends.
A 3-hour partial eclipse of the moon last Saturday and the fact that lightning struck my laptop dead last Thursday (under my very nose, with a big flash!) only served to reinforce the fascination of celestial relationships and the sky we live in.
Seemingly, Aristarchus never witnessed an annular ('ring-encircled') solar eclipse. I call that interesting. The curious can read more about different types of solar eclipses at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse
Cheers,
Int