Imperfect endings for the verb veto

Are you learning Latin with D'Ooge's Beginners Latin Book? Here's where you can meet other learners using this textbook. Use this board to ask questions and post your work for feedback and comments from others.
Post Reply
Thomas3333333
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 1:47 pm

Imperfect endings for the verb veto

Post by Thomas3333333 »

Hi,

I discovered that veto (to forbid) is an irregular verb with the 2nd principal part being vetare and the perfect tense vetui.

Can anyone tell me what the imperfect endings would be?

Thankyou.

Gonzalo
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 510
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:58 am

Post by Gonzalo »

You can form the rest of the perfect conjugation in this manner: vetui, vetuisti, vetuit, vetuimus, vetuistis & vetuerunt (less frequent, archaic form, the 3rd plural person with the ending in -ere).

I don´t know which other parts of the verb you would need to know in order to have knowledge of the rest.
Last edited by Gonzalo on Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

modus.irrealis
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:08 am
Location: Toronto

Post by modus.irrealis »

Except for the really irregular verbs (sum, eo, volo, etc. and their compounds), all the forms based on the first two principal parts are formed regularly -- it's one of the nice things about Latin. So in this case, the imperfect would be:

vetabam, vetabas, vetabat, vetabamus, vetabatis, vetabant

So the irregularity, if you want to call it that, is just that the third (and fourth) principal parts are formed in an unexpected way. But once you know the principal parts, everything else is regular.

Thomas3333333
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 1:47 pm

Post by Thomas3333333 »

Given that the present infinitive is vetare, is it still proper to call it a first conjugation verb despite it being an irregular one.

Thanks.

modus.irrealis
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:08 am
Location: Toronto

Post by modus.irrealis »

First conjugation just refers to the first two principal parts, so that's why veto and sto and so on are considered first conjugation verbs. It's just that the (vast) majority of first conjugation verbs form their perfect in the same way, but that doesn't seem to be the case with the other conjugations.

Post Reply