lesson 3 - a tense problem

Are you reading Homeric Greek? Whether you are a total beginner or an advanced Homerist, here you can meet kindred spirits. Besides Homer, use this board for all things early Greek poetry.
Post Reply
Tertius Robertus
Textkit Fan
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:05 am
Location: 666 Burning Hotties Road, Ol' Dis by Styx, 5th inner circle, Hell.

lesson 3 - a tense problem

Post by Tertius Robertus »

hi

in lesson 3 mr φα?? introduces this verb ην and ησαν which are translated as was, there was. but which tense is this? is this the past (latin fuit) or the imperfect (Latin erat), (both of which are translated as was) ? do the greeks distinguish between them at all?

thanks

Gonzalo
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 510
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:58 am

Post by Gonzalo »

Tertius Robertus, ἦσαν is an imperfect indicative (third plural person) tense of εἰμὶ. It's what I know, it is translated like "they were".
In principio erat verbum.
?ν α?χή ἦν ? Λόγος

Tertius Robertus
Textkit Fan
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:05 am
Location: 666 Burning Hotties Road, Ol' Dis by Styx, 5th inner circle, Hell.

Post by Tertius Robertus »

thanks!

modus.irrealis
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:08 am
Location: Toronto

Re: lesson 3 - a tense problem

Post by modus.irrealis »

Tertius Robertus wrote:do the greeks distinguish between them at all?
No, in the sense that ειμι has neither aorist nor perfect forms. But there are other verbs like γίγνομαι whose meaning comes close to fuit.

Tertius Robertus
Textkit Fan
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:05 am
Location: 666 Burning Hotties Road, Ol' Dis by Styx, 5th inner circle, Hell.

Post by Tertius Robertus »

gratias, mode!

Post Reply