I have broken this off into a new theme because we have drifted a bit from greeting you as a new member.
The other text I wished to refer you to would be RAmopAkhyAna - the Story of RAma in the MahABhArata - An Independenet -Study Reader in Sanskrit by Peter Scharf. The approach is multifaceted but centers on careful linguistic analysis of the selected text. For each shloka there is 1) a literal english translation 2) the text in devanagari 3) the text in transliteration 4) the text in transliteration with the sandhi broken and a coded grammatical parsing of each word 5) a vocabulary for each word that gives further grammatical insight.
Sanskrit is not something I am currently working on although it remains a cherished future project. When I was more actively engaged in these studies, I extensively researched the best learning resources. I have already shared what I consider to be the best published guides to developing reading knowledge after one has completed basic grammar. Now I will share with you several excellent and FREE online resources that I have discovered:
http://www.yorku.ca/inpar/Sanskrit.html
FLASH CARDS
http://www.chitrapurmath.net/sanskrit/sanskrit.asp
Sanskrit lessons developed by a (I believe) swami in sankaryacharya's sampradaya; his math is a a place called chitra pur
http://acharya.iitm.ac.in/sanskrit/tutor.php
Excellent sanskrit lessons developed by university affiliated computer/language geeks - also fonts for all the indian languages if I recall well
http://www.yorku.ca/inpar/Sanskrit.html
Sanskrit lessons and texts in transliteration from some chinese university - they have a bhuddist slant
What follows is the only non-FREE resource
http://samskrita-bharati.org/newsite/index.php
The web page of sanskrita bharati, an ngo dedicated the spread of vedic culture and even spoken sanskrit. Inexpensive couses and degrees are offered
attention member "sanskrit" - RESOURCES
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:34 pm
- Location: Washington DC
-
- Textkit Member
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:53 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Thanks for your comments on these websites. I was enrolled in the classes from chitrapurmath.net three years ago. I did like the email support from the teachers, but after a while they stopped adding new lessons.
I am sorry I didn't see this thread earlier. I haven't visited textkit for three months!
I am sorry I didn't see this thread earlier. I haven't visited textkit for three months!
-
- Textkit Member
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:56 am
Alright I have Sanskrit questions. First, when using the devanagari script, I know that when external Sandhi turns two vowels into one, you obviously need to write the two words as one, but where else? I sometimes see two words with a space and sometimes sans. Is there a rule for this?
Is it recommended that I memorize the Sandhi grids or should I do as the book says and refer to it when I need it? What about conjunct consonants?
The retroflex n shows up sometimes as three vertical lines (the first bent towards the right a bit) and sometimes different. This is in the same book. Is there a reason for this?
One translation was "Let us sit down" and they gave the answer as "Upavishamah," which is "we sit down." Is the hortative just implied, with no auxillary verb or mood change needed?
I'm using Coulson's "Teach Yourself Sanskrit," which I've heard is good but difficult. I'm loving it so far, but I wanted to know if anyone here has experience with it.
Is it recommended that I memorize the Sandhi grids or should I do as the book says and refer to it when I need it? What about conjunct consonants?
The retroflex n shows up sometimes as three vertical lines (the first bent towards the right a bit) and sometimes different. This is in the same book. Is there a reason for this?
One translation was "Let us sit down" and they gave the answer as "Upavishamah," which is "we sit down." Is the hortative just implied, with no auxillary verb or mood change needed?
I'm using Coulson's "Teach Yourself Sanskrit," which I've heard is good but difficult. I'm loving it so far, but I wanted to know if anyone here has experience with it.
-
- Textkit Member
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:56 am
I got it down in less than two days and I'll tell you how I did it. I have one of these lovely moleskine notebooks and a pencil that go everywhere I go. When I see a sign I write it in devanagari. When I hear a name, devanagari. When I'm in the shower I cover the glass panes with devanagari. The trick is to keep forgetting it but to keep remembering it again. Every second I have to spare I try to visualize the letters in my head. If I can't remember one, I open it up and look it up.
You can also get some patterns down for the letters. The retroflex are all, except for da, curly, and it gets curlier as it gets more voiced and aspirated, which sounds stupid but works. Same for the labials. Pa and pha differ by little, as does bh from m. Ba is like va but with a line through it, and that's easy to remember because they're just naturally similar consonants, like hebrew beth and veth. Some you just use so much you can't help but to remember it, like ya, ta, sa, or ma. Basically, don't try to memorize all of it at once but take it step by step is how I did it.
You can also get some patterns down for the letters. The retroflex are all, except for da, curly, and it gets curlier as it gets more voiced and aspirated, which sounds stupid but works. Same for the labials. Pa and pha differ by little, as does bh from m. Ba is like va but with a line through it, and that's easy to remember because they're just naturally similar consonants, like hebrew beth and veth. Some you just use so much you can't help but to remember it, like ya, ta, sa, or ma. Basically, don't try to memorize all of it at once but take it step by step is how I did it.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:08 am
- Location: Toronto
Thanks for the tips - although oftentimes, the character I write down looks nothing like the character in my book.
Stuff like that is effective for me in remembering stuff too.Agrippa wrote:The retroflex are all, except for da, curly, and it gets curlier as it gets more voiced and aspirated, which sounds stupid but works.