Textkit Logo

Missing vocative in first declension

Are you reading Homeric Greek? Whether you are a total beginner or an advanced Homerist, here you can meet kindred spirits. Beside Homer, use this board for all things early Greek poetry.

Missing vocative in first declension

Postby jk0592 » Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:22 am

In Pharr, the paradigm for nouns of the first declension ending in α, such as θάλλασσα, are shown without giving the singular vocative.
This makes memorizing the declension difficult, since it does not contain the same number of elements as for the other paradigms,
which contain all the NGDAV cases.
So, is the missing vocative really absent in Homer, or is there another reason ?
Textkit Member
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:20 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Postby GlottalGreekGeek » Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:14 am

That is a typo. It should say "N. V." instead of merely "N", since in the declension of θάλλασσα the nominative and vocative are identical.

Though vocatives are not as common as, say, subjunctives, in Homeric or other Greek.
User avatar
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 903
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 3:37 am
Location: Mountain View

Return to Homeric Greek and Early Greek Poetry

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests