Textkit Logo

Inverse of Donut

Philosophers and rhetoricians, Welcome!

Inverse of Donut

Postby Zeus the Goddess » Wed Aug 20, 2003 4:55 pm

What is the inverse of donut?<br /><br />Methinks inversing a donut would result in a universe full of donut with a donut-shaped hole!<br /><br />mmmm....
phpbb
Zeus the Goddess
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 7:09 am
Location: Sea of Olympus

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby benissimus » Wed Aug 20, 2003 8:31 pm

The inverse of donut is a donut-hole. I like donut holes, but not as much a donuts, although in quantity I would think they are both reasonably comparable.
flebile nescio quid queritur lyra, flebile lingua murmurat exanimis, respondent flebile ripae
User avatar
benissimus
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 4:32 am
Location: Berkeley, California

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby Lumen_et_umbra » Thu Aug 21, 2003 1:36 am

I think the inverse of a doughnut would be an infinitely large doughnut with a doughnut-dot in the center of its hole. ;D
phpbb
Lumen_et_umbra
Textkit Member
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:12 am
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby Keesa » Thu Aug 21, 2003 12:23 pm

The dot that comes out of the hole of the donut, definitely. Because the hole contains the essence of the donut; therefore, a donut-dot with a circle of hole around it is the exact opposite of the donut. (And also less fun to eat.)
phpbb
Keesa
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1108
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:59 pm

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby Raya » Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:25 pm

But... well, the hole of a donut isn't just a 'dot'! It would be, if donuts were 2D hollow circles... but considering the 3D objects that donuts are, the donut hole actually extends beyond the space enclosed by the donut to the space that encloses the donut.<br /><br />...or something
phpbb
User avatar
Raya
Textkit Fan
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:27 am

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby Keesa » Sat Aug 23, 2003 11:41 am

An entire universe of donut with a donut-shaped nothing in the middle?
phpbb
Keesa
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1108
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:59 pm

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby mingshey » Wed Aug 27, 2003 5:34 am

Once I read an article that says the inside of a donut(they call it torus) and the entire space outside the donut is topologically identical, sharing the boundary.<br /><br />(Let me do a bit of search-work...)<br /><br />Click and take a look at the animations here.<br /> ;D
User avatar
mingshey
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1325
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 6:38 am
Location: Seoul

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby annis » Wed Aug 27, 2003 12:46 pm

[quote author=The Goddess Zeus link=board=13;threadid=517;start=0#4520 date=1061398510]<br />What is the inverse of donut?<br />[/quote]<br /><br />http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Torus.html, about half way down.
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
annis
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
Location: Madison, WI, USA

HA!

Postby Zeus the Goddess » Wed Aug 27, 2003 7:29 pm

Donut is not torus!<br />Donut is MORE than torus!<br />Torus is shape only!<br />Donut contains ESSENCE!<br /><br />What is inverse of donut shape AND essence?
phpbb
Zeus the Goddess
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2003 7:09 am
Location: Sea of Olympus

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby mingshey » Wed Aug 27, 2003 11:34 pm

What is inverse of donut shape AND essence?
<br /><br />imagine a world filled with the essence exept a small empty hole of donut-shape.<br /><br />Then the essence is inside the inverse of a torus, which is again a torus. To say, the ESSENCE outside the torus is also inside another torus, which makes also a donut.--let's call it the BIG donut.<br /><br />Well, then the problem will be "what is the inverse of the essence of donut?".<br /><br />If it is the voidness, then, flip the torus and you get the big donut, and then exchange the essence and the void to get the original "SMALL" donut.<br /><br />If it is yet another thing, the discussion goes on to find the inverse of essence.<br />
User avatar
mingshey
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1325
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 6:38 am
Location: Seoul

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby Keesa » Thu Aug 28, 2003 11:40 am

The opposite of essence is nothingness...the opposite of something is nothing...therefore, the inverse of essence of donut is a world completely without donut-without idea of donut. <br /><br />I doubt that's the answer you're looking for. :D<br /><br />Keesa
phpbb
Keesa
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1108
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:59 pm

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby Lex » Fri Sep 12, 2003 3:12 pm

[quote author=The Goddess Zeus link=board=13;threadid=517;start=0#4520 date=1061398510]<br />What is the inverse of donut?<br />[/quote]<br /><br />A don't-nut, of course!
I, Lex Llama, super genius, will one day rule this planet! And then you'll rue the day you messed with me, you damned dirty apes!
User avatar
Lex
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 732
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:34 pm
Location: A top-secret underground llama lair.

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby Keesa » Fri Sep 12, 2003 10:42 pm

;D<br /><br />Good one!
phpbb
Keesa
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1108
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:59 pm

Re:Inverse of Donut

Postby mingshey » Mon Sep 15, 2003 5:29 am

[quote author=Lex link=board=13;threadid=517;start=0#5905 date=1063379557]<br />A don't-nut, of course!<br />[/quote]<br /><br />D'oh, clever!<br />
User avatar
mingshey
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1325
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 6:38 am
Location: Seoul

Postby threewood14 » Thu Feb 19, 2004 11:55 pm

the inverse of a donut is of course an anti-donut. you have to understand anti-matter to get this. it would be a reverse image of the donut.

"If you ever meet your anti-self, you not shake hands."
--Stephen Hawking

__________
threewood14
threewood14
Textkit Fan
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:11 pm
Location: Southie

Postby Rhapsody » Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:04 pm

its a ring of dough filled with a tiny crust of fried dough
Rhapsody
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 3:51 pm

Postby Evito » Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:20 am

As Jarod The Pretender once asked: If this is the hole (pointing at the donut), why do they call this the donuthole (pointing at the donut-hole)?
phpbb
Evito
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Postby threewood14 » Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:48 pm

Last post made by threewood14
phpbb
threewood14
Textkit Fan
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:11 pm
Location: Southie

essence?

Postby 666blasphemer » Thu Apr 29, 2004 9:40 pm

The essence of donut? is that like a deodorant or aphrodiasiac for truckers and or very over weight people?
User avatar
666blasphemer
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:42 pm

Postby threewood14 » Thu Apr 29, 2004 11:36 pm

i wouldnt worry too much about dounghnuts except how they taste.
phpbb
threewood14
Textkit Fan
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:11 pm
Location: Southie

Postby Apotheosis » Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:25 am

The inverse of a doughnut is simply a doughnut hole, aka munchkin. If you have a sphere of no matter surrounded by a torus of matter, then the inverse is simply a torus of no matter surrounding a sphere of matter. Simple as that. Have a nice day! 8)
Last edited by Apotheosis on Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
phpbb
User avatar
Apotheosis
Textkit Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 10:25 pm

Postby threewood14 » Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:26 pm

Or an anti-dounut...which would resemble the munchkin in some way still.
phpbb
threewood14
Textkit Fan
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:11 pm
Location: Southie

Postby Apotheosis » Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:44 pm

But an anti-doughnut wouldn't be the same as the inverse of a doughnut... Instead of being composed of matter, an anti-doughnut would be composed of anti-matter. So I don't think it would be quite the same...
phpbb
User avatar
Apotheosis
Textkit Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 10:25 pm

Postby threewood14 » Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:24 pm

maybe a doughnt would be better tasting if it was an anti-doughnut though. i mean, if you had a glazed doughnut and an anti glazed doughnut, and u eat them, they would be opposites right? Chocolate and Vinilla!
phpbb
threewood14
Textkit Fan
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:11 pm
Location: Southie

Postby Keesa » Thu May 06, 2004 12:33 pm

After a long and grueling morning of research, I have found the answer to the question that has puzzled philosophers for months: the true inverse of donut.

The true inverse of donut is the donut box that had one donut (which you had planned to eat for breakfast) but now has no donut (because little sister had the same idea). The empty donut box is everything that donut is not; the wistful yearning that donut satisfies; the lack of sweet, gooey donut-ness that donut is, the absense of the glorious expectation of donut, which is replaced by deep depression and despair at loss of donut.

No doubt about it...this is the opposite of donut.

AND I WANT MY DONUT!!!!!

~Keesa
phpbb
Keesa
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1108
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:59 pm

Postby primitive » Thu May 06, 2004 7:43 pm

:D I didn't see this thread! What a funny topic.

The true inverse of donut is the donut box that had one donut (which you had planned to eat for breakfast) but now has no donut (because little sister had the same idea).


I think you have hit this one right on. The inverse of a dounut would be this. I think what you could say is that the inverse of a donut is no dounut.
phpbb
primitive
Textkit Member
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 11:27 pm
Location: Boston

Postby Michaelyus » Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:34 pm

And the empty do(ugh)nut box (alas... oh do(ugh)nut box so empty and forlorn) is of course composed of antimatter, and devoid of anything except the bitter air of disappointment and impulsive desire.
phpbb
Michaelyus
Textkit Fan
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: London, UK

Postby Anna Coluthon » Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:15 pm

although I don't think keesa's answer can be surpassed, I am wondering whether perhaps an argument might not be made for an iced frappacino, sucked through a straw?
phpbb
Anna Coluthon
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:39 pm

Postby Jefferson Cicero » Sat Sep 18, 2004 3:30 pm

What about donuts with no holes, like Bismarcks? What about the filling inside them? Have they no voice here? And what is the opposite of a donut hole (the vacuous ones, not the ones you eat) if not filling?

What would happen if you inversed such a no-hole donut? A universe of donut with a hole in the centre that has no donut hole that would be donut and not hole?
User avatar
Jefferson Cicero
Textkit Member
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 6:55 pm
Location: Declivifluminia, Meridiana

Postby Emma_85 » Thu Oct 21, 2004 8:58 am

Ok... I'll post my opinion now.
The inverse of a donut is a ball of icing in a box in a universe full of donuts.

:oops:

I'd better hide my head in a brown paper bag now - one with donuts in it :D !
phpbb
User avatar
Emma_85
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 1564
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: London

Postby MyIlium » Sat Oct 23, 2004 5:44 am

Potato chips. I should think this would be obvious. Just think: Donuts are sweet, potato chips are salty. Also, the shape. Potato chips are flat and they crumble easily, unlike donuts, which are round and fat and very squeezable.

But they are both scrumptious! ^_~
phpbb
User avatar
MyIlium
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:54 pm
Location: Somewhere far, far away

Postby eleanor1183 » Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:01 am

Since I've come to this discussion late (just joined textkit today) I will give my totally different answer to the question of what is the inverse of donut.

Let us first define donut in terms of it's food characteristics.

It is sweet, with lots of carbs. It satisfies the appetite quickly, but has little staying power - within an hour you find yourself needing something more.

So what would it's food inverse be?

not(sweet) = savory
not(carb) = protein/meat

So the inverse of donut would be a solid chunk of roast beef, or maybe a nice T-bone steak.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
phpbb
User avatar
eleanor1183
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 1:03 am
Location: Kansas

Postby Episcopus » Fri Dec 10, 2004 4:05 pm

Yes. 1/donut in terms of nutritional value is whey protein. Which I eat often. But no donuts, thus obeying dem Inversen Theory.
phpbb
User avatar
Episcopus
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 8:57 pm

die Theorie für Inversion

Postby installer_swan » Fri Dec 10, 2004 4:56 pm

Recipe for making 1/doughnuts:

To make a 1/doughnut in accordance with die Theorie for inversion you will require:
* 5 litres of molten lava
* 1 doughnut
* Peppermint Sauce
* Salt to taste

Mode of preparation:
1. Take the molten volcanic lava in a volcanic lava can.
2. Put a doughnut into it when molten and stir.
3. Allow mix to cool.
4. The doughnut would have vapourised/burnt/incinerated leaving solidified lava with doughnut-shaped hole.
5. This is required inverse of the doughnut.

6. Serve chilled with peppermin sauce.

The tastetexture is bittercrumbly, exactly the inverse of a doughnut, The shape is as close to 1/doughnut as possible with a finite ammount of ingredients.

So, Voila... 1 doughnut^(-1) is ready.


Shanth
phpbb
User avatar
installer_swan
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:38 am
Location: Kanpur, India

Inverse of a donut

Postby ethopoeia » Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:36 am

As I see it, the inverse of a donut is a biscuit within a hole.
User avatar
ethopoeia
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:33 pm

Inverse of a donut

Postby ethopoeia » Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:37 am

As I see it, the inverse of a donut is a biscuit within a hole.
User avatar
ethopoeia
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:33 pm

Postby cdm2003 » Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:16 am

...and no one has thought of the possibility of an inverted jelly-filled donut? Think of the topological ramifications of this discussion if one began with a cruller or perhaps the more mundane midwestern bear claw?
User avatar
cdm2003
Textkit Fan
 
Posts: 309
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:54 pm
Location: Kansas City, Missouri, USA

Postby EgoIoYoEu » Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:29 pm

All this rubbish about the inverse of doughnut is ridiculous. You are ALL missing the point. In the words of the incredibly deep and philosophically rich Homer Simpson...

Mmm...Doughnuts.....

Thank you. Issue resolved. You may all bow in acquiescence to my superiority.
phpbb
User avatar
EgoIoYoEu
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:52 pm
Location: USA


Return to The Academy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 11 guests