Can anybody give me a brief summary/explanation of all this laryangeal/schwa stuff? It's obviosuly a major part of PIE philology but it seems very confusing to me. I understand that they were consonants, but why are they listed (in Sihler) in conjunction with vowels (such as eH1) and what effect do they have on subsequent languages (i.e. reflexes)?
Or is it not possible to summarise this issue? It certainly seems complicated and contraversial.
Laryngeals etc
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2003 9:46 pm
- Location: Christ Church Oxford
Laryngeals etc
Last edited by Thucydides on Mon May 03, 2004 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 7:15 am
- Location: The Netherlands
It's certainly complicated, but I'm not sure it's still controversial. I think the laryngeals are listed with vowels because their reflections in Latin & Greek are (mostly?) vowels.
If Sihler isn't clear enough, you may try another book such as:
R.S.P. Beekes, Comparative Indo-European linguistics : an introduction (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995)
H. Rix, Historische Grammatik des Griechischen.
Sorry, not much help I can offer you right now.
Ptolemaios
If Sihler isn't clear enough, you may try another book such as:
R.S.P. Beekes, Comparative Indo-European linguistics : an introduction (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995)
H. Rix, Historische Grammatik des Griechischen.
Sorry, not much help I can offer you right now.
Ptolemaios
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 708
- Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 4:47 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Contact:
Hi,
It is complicated. I've yet to see a wholly lucid explanation. But here's a simplified condensation of the several sources I've read (Beekes, Palmer, Sihler).
Ancient greek shows two different systems of vowel alternation (ablaut). The more familiar one is the variation between
e,o,0 (where zero means the vowel is completely lost)
An example in greek of this ablaut sequence is
λ[u]ε[/u]ίπω, λέλ[u]ο[/u]ιπα, ἔλιπον
The less familiar system shows alternation between several sets of long vowels, e.g.,
long e, long o, e (where the last e represents the zero grade)
An example in greek of this ablaut sequence is
τίθ[u]η[/u]μι, θ[u]ω[/u]μός, θ[u]ε[/u]τός
This leads to table of ablaut relations as shown below (this table also shows the other two long vowel ablaut sequences).
e, o, 0
long e, long o, e
long a, long o, a
long o, long o, o
Seeking to simplify this system, Saussure suggested that perhaps the long versions of the vowels were really equivalent to e
plus some other entity. That is:
long e = e + ?1
long a = e + ?2
long o = e + ?3
This suggestion simplified the greek ablaut system by basing it on the single, commoner ablaut sequence. A table of this simplified system
looks like this:
e, o, 0
eE, oE, E
eA, oA, A
eO, oO, O
Saussure called these entities (E,A,O) 'coefficients sonantiques'. They later came to be called schwas; then laryngeals (written H1, H2, H3).
Whatever they are called, some of their effects in greek are:
Before a vowel - a laryngeal disappears but not before coloring the vowel. Examples:
H1e > ε
H2e > α
H3e > ο
whence
ἔδω < *H1ed-
ἄγω < *H2eg-
Before a consonant at the start of a word - a laryngeal becomes a 'prothetic' vowel, and these vowels retain the character of
their original laryngeal. Examples:
ἀμέλγω < *H2melg-
ὀρέγω < *H3reg-
In vowel, laryngeal, consonant (VHC) sequences - a laryngeal disappears but colors and lengthens the vowel. Examples:
τίθ[u]η[/u]μι < *dhi-dheH1-mi
ἵστ[u]α[/u]μι < *si-steH2-mi
δίδ[u]ω[/u]μι < *di-dheH3-mi
I hope this helps.
Cordially,
Paul
It is complicated. I've yet to see a wholly lucid explanation. But here's a simplified condensation of the several sources I've read (Beekes, Palmer, Sihler).
Ancient greek shows two different systems of vowel alternation (ablaut). The more familiar one is the variation between
e,o,0 (where zero means the vowel is completely lost)
An example in greek of this ablaut sequence is
λ[u]ε[/u]ίπω, λέλ[u]ο[/u]ιπα, ἔλιπον
The less familiar system shows alternation between several sets of long vowels, e.g.,
long e, long o, e (where the last e represents the zero grade)
An example in greek of this ablaut sequence is
τίθ[u]η[/u]μι, θ[u]ω[/u]μός, θ[u]ε[/u]τός
This leads to table of ablaut relations as shown below (this table also shows the other two long vowel ablaut sequences).
e, o, 0
long e, long o, e
long a, long o, a
long o, long o, o
Seeking to simplify this system, Saussure suggested that perhaps the long versions of the vowels were really equivalent to e
plus some other entity. That is:
long e = e + ?1
long a = e + ?2
long o = e + ?3
This suggestion simplified the greek ablaut system by basing it on the single, commoner ablaut sequence. A table of this simplified system
looks like this:
e, o, 0
eE, oE, E
eA, oA, A
eO, oO, O
Saussure called these entities (E,A,O) 'coefficients sonantiques'. They later came to be called schwas; then laryngeals (written H1, H2, H3).
Whatever they are called, some of their effects in greek are:
Before a vowel - a laryngeal disappears but not before coloring the vowel. Examples:
H1e > ε
H2e > α
H3e > ο
whence
ἔδω < *H1ed-
ἄγω < *H2eg-
Before a consonant at the start of a word - a laryngeal becomes a 'prothetic' vowel, and these vowels retain the character of
their original laryngeal. Examples:
ἀμέλγω < *H2melg-
ὀρέγω < *H3reg-
In vowel, laryngeal, consonant (VHC) sequences - a laryngeal disappears but colors and lengthens the vowel. Examples:
τίθ[u]η[/u]μι < *dhi-dheH1-mi
ἵστ[u]α[/u]μι < *si-steH2-mi
δίδ[u]ω[/u]μι < *di-dheH3-mi
I hope this helps.
Cordially,
Paul
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2003 9:46 pm
- Location: Christ Church Oxford
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 708
- Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 4:47 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Fan
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2003 9:46 pm
- Location: Christ Church Oxford